Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology. 2006; 18 (6): 1123-1138
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-79653

ABSTRACT

This study compared the effect of general anesthesia or regional vertebral analgesia [subarachnoid or epidural] on postoperative cognitive function in 60 young adult [group A] and 60 elderly [group E] patients undergoing orthopedic and urologic surgery. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised for cognitive functions assessment was done preoperatively, and post operatively; one day and three days after surgery. Variations in heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tensions, and pH as well as serum bicarbonate, sodium and potassium levels, were assessed at the same time intervals. They did not show any significant change from the preoperative levels. Cognitive functions, one and three days after surgery, did not change significantly in young adult patients after either general or regional vertebral nor in elderly patients who received regional vertebral, as compared with the preoperative levels. Only elderly patients who received general anesthesia had significant decline in cognitive function one day after surgery. It significantly improved on the third postoperative day but still was significantly less than the preoperative level. Moreover, significantly better WAIS-R Scores were found in the elderly group one and three days after spinal anesthesia than after general anesthesia. The results indicate that general anesthesia poses a significant risk for the occurrence of early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients that can persist for 3 day after surgery. Regional vertebral analgesia is advantageous over general anesthesia for elderly patients in terms of a better postoperative neuropsychological functioning


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Neurocognitive Disorders , Anesthesia, General , Adult , Aged , Analgesia, Epidural
2.
Bulletin of Alexandria Faculty of Medicine. 2004; 40 (4): 349-360
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-65514

ABSTRACT

The preemptive use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] for postoperative analgesia is controversial because of a questionable benefit against increased risk of haemorrhagic complications. Meloxicam is a new NSAID with a pereferential COX-2 inhibitory activity and a better safety profile. In the present study, the efficacy of meloxicam and ketorolac, a nonselective commonly used NSAID, in relieving postoperative pain when given either before or after the operation and their effect on platelet function were compared. The study was conducted on 80 patients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery of 1-2 hours duration. In a randamized double blind fashion, patients received either I.M. meloxicam 15mg/day [Group M], or I.M. ketorolac 30mg 6 hourly [Group K], starting 30 min before the operation [subgroups M[1] and K[1] respectively] or just after closure of surgical wound [subgroups M[2] and K[2] respectively]. Pain scores [10 cm visual analogue scale] [VAS] were obtained for all the patients immediately after recovery and at 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours after recovery. Time latency to the first request of additional analgesic and the amount of the first 24 hours consumption of pethedine analgesia were also recorded. In order to evaluate the effect of the drugs on intraoperative hemostasis, bleeding time and platelet aggregation studies were obtained before and one hour after giving the premedication drugs in the subgroups M[1] and K[1] and also in M[2] as a control. There was no significant difference in VAS, in the amount of first day consumed pethedine or in the time latency to the first request for additional analgesic between patients who received either meloxicam or ketorolac, whether they received the drugs before or after the operation. However, patients who received either of the drugs before the operation has significantly less pain scors during the first 8 hours [in meloxicam subgroups] and 4 hours [in ketorolac subgroups], and consumed less pethedine than those who received the drugs after the completion of surgery. Intra-operative bleeding time was significantly prolonged relative to the preoperative values in the three tested subgroups. However, there was no significant difference in the changes that occurred in bleeding time between patients who received meloxicam and placebo. Patients who received ketorolac had significantly more prolonged bleeding time than those who received meloxicam or placebo. Ketorolac also induced significant depression in platelet aggregation while meloxicam and placebo did not. Equal levels of post-operative analgesia can be obtained by either meloxicam or ketorolac. Preoperative administration of either drugs provides better post-operative analgesia during the first few hours after recovery. In contrast with ketorolac, meloxicam does not affect intraoperative platelet function if given before the operation. Meloxicam is equally effective, but can be more safely administered preoperatively than ketorolac


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Platelet Function Tests , Bleeding Time
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL