Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Acta Med Indones ; 2009 Jan; 41(1): 11-4
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-47159

ABSTRACT

Aim: to evaluate the influence of pulmonary involvement at admission in predicting mortality among patients with severe leptospirosis. Methods: reprospective cohort study from medical record registry in Dr. Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta from 2003 to 2007. Pulmonary involvement was defined by the presence of pulmonary infiltrate, consolidation or pleural effusion in thorax radiography. Pulmonary edema was excluded. Admission data were collected. Follow-up records were noted until patients were discharded or died. The correlation between predictors (some patient characteristics on admission) and outcome (mortality) were evaluated using univariate analysis, and then proceeded to multivariable logistic regression analysis. P < 0.05 is considered statistically significant. Results: sixty patients with severe leptospirosis as a main diagnosis were evaluated. Fifty-five subjects were eligible for analysis, male patients 37 (67.3%) and mean age 42 +/- 15 years old. Pulmonary involvement was presence in 7 patients (12.7%). In univariate analysis only the presence of meningismus and pulmonary involvement were associated with mortality (p=0.001 and 0.006 respectively). In multivariable logistic regression, pulmonary involvement was independently a strong predictor of mortality (OR 9.9 95% CI (1.17 - 84.03), p=0.035). Conclusion: pulmonary involvement at admission is a strong predictor of mortality among patients with severe leptospirosis.


Subject(s)
Leptospirosis , Pulmonary Edema
2.
Acta Med Indones ; 2005 Oct-Dec; 37(4): 210-3
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-47116

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the efficacy of anti-emetic and prophylactic effects of 1 milligram (mg) versus 3 mg granisetron in cancer patients. METHODS: In this double blind, randomized, parallel study, 2-dose regimens of intra venous (IV) granisetron were evaluated in 39 cancer patients who were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to receive granisetron 1 mg IV plus dexamethasone 20 mg (group A) or granisetron 3 mg iv plus dexamethasone 20 mg (group B). A questionnaire was used to evaluate the anti-emetic effects of granisetron. RESULTS: Subjects consisted of 31 men and 8 women. In group A (19 patients) 57.9% showed complete response from vomiting, 10.5% of major response, and 31.6% of failure to anti-emetic therapy. There were 47.4% of patients free from nausea and 52.6% complained of nausea (mild, moderate, and severe nausea). Among group B (20 patients), 90% showed complete response from vomiting, 5% of major response, and 5% of failure to anti-emetic therapy. Eighty percent of patients were free from nausea, while 15% complained of mild nausea and 5% of moderate nausea. The differences were statistically significant for vomiting (p = 0.02) as well as for nausea (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Intravenous granisetron 3 mg has better efficacy than granisetron 1 mg in preventing cisplatin- induced acute emesis.


Subject(s)
Adult , Antiemetics/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Female , Granisetron/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Premedication , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/chemically induced
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL