ABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the clinical value of PUFA in the treatment of cancer cachexia,meta-analysis and systematic evaluation of literature was applied.Methods:According to the inclusion criteria,PubMed/MEDLINE,EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled TriMs for randomized controlled trims that compared PUFA treatments with placebo or no treatment in cancer cachexia were searched.Outcomes of interest were effects on weight,appetite,the level of CRP and IL-6,the composition of lean body mass and the quality of life.Results:Finally,16 articles were included in the analysis,which reported appetite (6 papers),C-reactive protein (9 papers),IL-6 (5 papers),lean tissue weight (7 papers) and quality of life assessment (7 papers),respectively.Conclusion:PUFAs for the treatment of cancer cachexia plays an irreplaceable role.The body weight,appetite,inflammation index and quality of life can be significantly improved,and the patients can tolerated the addition of PUFA during the treatment.