A systematic review on the correlation between selective dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor vildagliptin and risk of arthralgia/osteoarthritis / 药学实践杂志

Objective To systematically evaluate the correlation between selective dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibi-tor ,vildagliptin and risk of arthralgia/osteoarthritis .Methods The following databases of PubMed (1978 to February 2016) , the Cochrane Library (Issue 4 ,2015) ,EMbase (1974 to February 2016) ,CBM(1978 to February 2016) ,CNKI(1978 to Feb-ruary 2016) ,VIP(1989 to February 2016) were searched .The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for vildagliptin related ar-thralgia/osteoarthritis were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration system .The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5 .3 software .Results Ten RCTs were included .Meta-analysis showed that vildagliptin had higher risk of arthralgia/osteoar-thritis than other oral hypoglycemic agents or placebo (RR=1 .24 ,95% CI 1 .08 to 1 .44 ,P=0 .003) .Further analysis indica-ted that patients received different doses of vildagliptin had higher risk of arthralgia/osteoarthritis than the placebo group (RR=1 .35 ,95% CI 1 .02 to 1 .78 ,P=0 .04) .In particular ,the group who took vildagliptin 50mg once daily had significantly higher risk of arthralgia/osteoarthritis than the placebo group (RR=3 .04 ,95% CI 1 .44 to 6 .44 ,P=0 .004) .In comparison of other oral hypoglycemic agents ,the vildagliptin group had higher risk of arthralgia /osteoarthritis (RR=1 .19 ,95% CI 1 .01 to 1 .41 ,P=0 .04) .Conclusion Based on the Meta-analysis results ,vildagliptin increases the risk of arthralgia/osteoarthri-tis .Especially vildagliptin 50mg once daily had two times higher risk than the placebo group .However the long-term safety of vidagliptin still needs to be confirmed by RCTs with larger samples and long term follow-up .

The Efficacy and Long-Term Outcome of Microcoil Embolotherapy for Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy as well as long-term clinical outcomes of superselective microcoil embolization for lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2009, 26 patients with intended transcatheter embolotherapy for LGIB were retrospectively reviewed. Embolization was performed only when the catheter could be advanced to or distal to the mesenteric border of the bowel. The main purpose of our study was to assess technical success, recurrent bleeding rate and complications. We also evaluated the long-term clinical outcome, including late recurrent LGIB, bowel ischemia and the survival rate. RESULTS: Twenty-two bleeding sources were in the territory of superior mesenteric artery and four in the inferior mesenteric artery. Technical success was achieved in 22 patients (84.6%). The target vessel of embolization was vasa recta in seventeen patients and marginal artery in the remaining five patients. Early rebleeding occurred in two patients (7.7%) and bowel ischemia in two patients, of whom the embolized points were both at the marginal artery. Delayed recurrent bleeding (> 30 days) occurred in two angiodysplasia patients. Five patients (19.2%) died within the first 30 days of intervention. Long-term follow-up depicted estimated survival rates of 58.2 and 43.1% after one, and five years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter embolotherapy to treat LGIB is effective with low rebleeding and ischemic complications. Considering the advanced age and complex medical problems of these patients, the minimal invasive embolotherapy may be used as both a primary and potentially definitive treatment of LGIB.

Metallic Stent Placement in Hemodialysis Graft Patients after Insufficient Balloon Dilation

OBJECTIVE: We wanted to report our experience of metallic stent placement after insufficient balloon dilation in graft hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients (13 loop grafts in the forearm and 10 straight grafts in the upper arm) underwent metallic stent placement due to insufficient flow after urokinase thrombolysis and balloon dilation. The indications for metallic stent deployment included 1) recoil and/or kinked venous stenosis in 21 patients (venous anastomosis: 17 patients, peripheral outflow vein: four patients); and 2) major vascular rupture in two patients. Metallic stents 8-10mm in diameter and 40-80 mm in length were used. Of them, eight stents were deployed across the elbow crease. Access patency was determined by clinical follow-up and the overall rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: No procedure-related complications (stent fracture or central migration) were encountered except for a delayed Wallstent shortening/migration at the venous anastomosis, which resulted in early access failure. The overall primary and secondary patency rates (+/- standard error) of all the vascular accesses in our 23 patients at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months were 69% +/- 9 and 88% +/- 6, 41% +/- 10 and 88% +/- 6, 30% +/- 10 and 77% +/- 10, and 12% +/- 8 and 61% +/- 13, respectively. For the forearm and upper-arm grafts, the primary and secondary patency rates were 51% +/- 16 and 86% +/- 13 vs 45% +/- 15 and 73%+/-13 at 6 months, and 25% +/- 15 and 71% +/- 17 vs 23% +/- 17 and 73% +/- 13 at 12 months (p = .346 and .224), respectively. CONCLUSION: Metallic stent placement is a safe and effective means for treating peripheral venous lesions in dialysis graft patients after insufficient balloon dilation. No statistically difference in the patency rates between the forearm and upper-arm patient groups was seen.