Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 728-730, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-796670

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To compare the preliminary efficacy and nursing care of radioprotective agent skin relief cream and Biafine for the prevention and treatment of neck radiation-induced skin damage in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.@*Methods@#Sixty-seven nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients initially treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Prevention and Control Center from 2016 to 2017 were recruited and assigned into the control (n=36) and experimental groups (n=31). In the control group, Biafine was applied to the skin in the radiation field and radioprotective agent skin relief cream was applied in the experimental group. The degree of radiation skin injury and adverse reactions were statistically compared between two groups.@*Results@#No grade IV radiation-induced skin damage occurred in two groups. The incidence rates of grade 1, 2 and 3 radiation-induced skin damage in the experimental group were 45%, 42% and 13%, and 17%, 64% and 19% in the control group, respectively (P=0.04). Radioprotective agent skin relief cream could control the radiation-induced skin injury within grade Ⅱ and significantly increase the proportion of grade I skin injury.@*Conclusion@#Medical radioprotective agent is superior to Biafine in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced skin damage in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

2.
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology ; (6): 728-730, 2019.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-791416

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the preliminary efficacy and nursing care of radioprotective agent skin relief cream and Biafine for the prevention and treatment of neck radiation-induced skin damage in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods Sixty-seven nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients initially treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Prevention and Control Center from 2016 to 2017 were recruited and assigned into the control (n =36) and experimental groups (n =31).In the control group,Biafine was applied to the skin in the radiation field and radioprotective agent skin relief cream was applied in the experimental group.The degree of radiation skin injury and adverse reactions were statistically compared between two groups.Results No grade Ⅳ radiation-induced skin damage occurred in two groups.The incidence rates of grade 1,2 and 3 radiation-induced skin damage in the experimental group were 45%,42% and 13%,and 17%,64% and 19% in the control group,respectively (P=0.04).Radioprotective agent skin relief cream could control the radiation-induced skin injury within grade Ⅱ and significantly increase the proportion of grade Ⅰ skin injury.Conclusion Medical radioprotective agent is superior to Biafine in the prevention and treatment of radiation-induced skin damage in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

3.
Modern Clinical Nursing ; (6): 25-27,28, 2014.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-598916

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the adverse reactions by stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and summarize nursing experience.Methods Forty-one patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma from the radiation department of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from July 2010 to May 2012 were enrolled in this retrospective study.The adverse reactions were closely observed and the patients were given pertinent nursing.Results The effectiveness rate was 56.2%.During the therapy,36 patients developed nausea/vomiting of grade 1-2,taking up 87.8%,18 had grade 1-3 elevation of liver enzymes,taking up 43.9%,16 had grade 1-2 decrease of white blood cells,taking up 39.0%,8 had grade 1 anemia,taking up 19.5%and 21 had grade 1-2 decrease of blood platelet,taking up 51.2%.The adverse reactions were contained satisfactorily through careful observations and pertinent nursing.Conclusions The toxic reactions by SBRT are nausea,vomiting,enzymes elevation and decrease of whole blood cell.Therefore,nurses need to observe these toxic reactions carefully and give pertinent care to the patients so as to prevent the complications,especially radiation-induced liver injury.

4.
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing ; (36): 36-37, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-388686

ABSTRACT

Objective We observed the effect of topical application of mucopolyccharide polysulfate cream (hirudoid) on phlebitis prevention initiated by continuous infusion of 5-Fu with Baxter infusor. Methods 60 untreated patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were selected and randomly divided into the control group (28 patients) and the experimental group (32 patients). The patients of the experimental group were gently massaged with hirudoid along the infusion vein since the beginning of 5-Fu infusion, while the control group received no intervention. The incidence of phlebitis was observed in the two groups. Results The incidence of phlebitis in the experimental group was lower and the degree was lighter compared with the control group. Conclusions Hirudoid can decrease the incidence and released the symptoms of phlebitis initiated by continuous infusion of 5-Fu with Baxter infusor, and is effective to prevent and treat phlebitis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL