ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of different midwifery methods on the pelvic floor function of parturients and nursing experience.Methods From January 2018 to December 2018,200 cases of vaginal delivery in Enze Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Taizhou Hospital were selected as study objects .According to the random number table method,they were divided into non-invasive midwifery group and traditional midwifery group , with 100 cases in each group.The non-invasive midwifery group adopted non-invasive midwifery,while the traditional midwifery group adopted traditional midwifery.The pelvic floor muscle strength ,pelvic floor muscle dysfunction and postpartum hemorrhage were observed in the two groups.Results There was no statistically significant difference in pelvic floor muscle strength between the two groups in grade 0,grade Ⅰ,grade Ⅱ,grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅳ(all P＞0.05).The pelvic floor muscle strength of the observation group in grade Ⅴ(45.00%) was higher than that of the control group (31.00%),the difference was statistically significant (χ2 ＝4.160,P＜0.05).The incidence of sexual dysfunction (15.00%) and stress urinary incontinence (28.00%) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (41.00%,54.00%) (χ2 ＝16.766,13.973,all P＜0.05).The amount of bleeding 2 hours after delivery in the observation group [(245.93 ±19.89) mL] was less than that in the control group [(297.42 ±24.21)mL] (t ＝16.433,P＜0.05).Conclusion Non-invasive midwifery has little effect on the pelvic floor function of parturients ,and the incidence rate of sexual dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence is low , and the amount of bleeding is small ,which is worthy of clinical reference.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the effect of different midwifery methods on the pelvic floor function of parturients and nursing experience.@*Methods@#From January 2018 to December 2018, 200 cases of vaginal delivery in Enze Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Taizhou Hospital were selected as study objects.According to the random number table method, they were divided into non-invasive midwifery group and traditional midwifery group, with 100 cases in each group.The non-invasive midwifery group adopted non-invasive midwifery, while the traditional midwifery group adopted traditional midwifery.The pelvic floor muscle strength, pelvic floor muscle dysfunction and postpartum hemorrhage were observed in the two groups.@*Results@#There was no statistically significant difference in pelvic floor muscle strength between the two groups in grade 0, grade Ⅰ, grade Ⅱ, grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅳ(all P>0.05). The pelvic floor muscle strength of the observation group in grade Ⅴ (45.00%) was higher than that of the control group (31.00%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.160, P<0.05). The incidence of sexual dysfunction (15.00%) and stress urinary incontinence (28.00%) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (41.00%, 54.00%) (χ2=16.766, 13.973, all P<0.05). The amount of bleeding 2 hours after delivery in the observation group [(245.93±19.89)mL] was less than that in the control group [(297.42±24.21)mL] (t=16.433, P<0.05).@*Conclusion@#Non-invasive midwifery has little effect on the pelvic floor function of parturients, and the incidence rate of sexual dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence is low, and the amount of bleeding is small, which is worthy of clinical reference.