Endoscopic Treatment with Band Ligation and Electrocoagulation for Non-Variceal, Non-Ulcer Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study compared the therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) with that of electrocoagulation for treating non-variceal, non-ulcer (NVNU) upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding. METHODS: This study included 89 patients who underwent EBL and 56 patients in whom monopolar electrocoagulation was performed for NVNU UGI bleeding. The lesions treated were Mallory-Weiss tear in 91 patients, Dieulafoy's lesion in 42 patients and angiodysplasia in 12 patients. RESULTS: The initial hemostatic rate was 97% in the EBL group and 91% in the electrocoagulation group, but this was not statistically different. Rebleeding occurred in 5 of 89 patients (5.6%) in the EBL group and in 8 of 56 patients (14.3%) in the electrocoagulation group (p=0.07). Thrombocytopenia or prothrombin time prolongation was confirmed to be a significant risk factor for rebleeding. The rebleeding rate in the high risk group was significantly lower than in the EBL group (9% vs. 30%, respectively, p=0.03). The median procedure time was significantly shorter in the EBL group compared with that in the electrocoagulation group (median 5.6 minutes vs. 8.3 minutes, respectively, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: EBL and electrocoagulation are both effective for treating NVNU UGI bleeding, and EBL is especially safe and effective for the cases with a high risk for rebleeding.

A Case of Gastritis Cystica Polyposa Presenting as Multiple Polypoid Lesions / 대한소화기내시경학회지

Gastritis cystica polyposa (GCP) is a rare lesion characterized by hyperplastic and cystic dilatation of the gastric mucous glands infiltrating into the underlying submucosa. A cumulative experience suggests that GCP represents a manifestation of a spectrum of reactive inflammatory responses to mucosal injury. The case reported herein is a GCP developed as multiple polypoid lesions with a circular arrangement in the gastric mucosae along the gastrojejunostomy site.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Simvastatin, 10 mg and 20 mg in the Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia Patients Over 60-Year Old

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum cholesterol level is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Simvastatin is effective for treating hypercholesterolemia. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of 6-month therapy with simvastatin with relatively low dose, 10 mg and 20 mg/day over 60-year-old patients. METHODS: Seventy-senven patients with hyperlipidemia(triglycerides 130 mg/dL) were randomized to receive either simvastatin 10 mg/day(n=32) or 20 mg/day(n=45). Efficacy was determined by measuring changes from baseline in lipid parameters including LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein(HDL) cholesterol. RESULTS: Of the senventy-seven patients randomized to treatment, eighteen patients were men and fiftynine patients were women. sixty-five percent of patients had hypertension, eighteen percent coronary artery disease and fourteen percent type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mean baseline lipid concentrations were 254 (total cholesterol), 291(triglycerides), 50(HDL) and 166 mg/dL(LDL). Both 10 mg and 20 mg of simvastatin produced statistically significant improvements in all measured serum lipid parameters(p<0.001). Compared with 10 mg of simvastatin, 20 mg of simvastatin produced significantly greater(p<0.001) reductions from baseline LDL cholesterol(32.9 mg/dL vs 24.2 mg/d). There was no significant difference in both doses at improving total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol level and TG cholesterol level. Percentage of patients at goal LDL as recommended by NCEP guideline(ATP III) were 100% and 89% for patients in low risk but 25% and 38.5% for patients in coronary heart disease and its risk equivalents, taking 10 mg and 20 mg/day respectively. Both doses were well tolerated. Only 3 patients(6.6%) in the 20 mg group and one patient(3. 1%) in the 10 mg group experienced mild adverse events. Most patients contacted by telephone wanted to take 10 mg of simvastatin. CONCLUSION: In patients with hypercholesterolemia over 60 year old in Korea, both doses(10 mg, 20 mg) of simvastatin were effective in improving serum lipid parameters and well-tolerated. We recommend, considering patients preference, that 10 mg of simvastatin be intial dosage and in patients with coronary heart disease, higher doses than 20 mg should be prescribed to allow most patients to reach their NCEP target levels.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of simvastatin, 10 mg and 20 mg in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia / 대한내과학회지

BACKGROUND: Elevated serum cholesterol level is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Simvastatin is effective for treating hypercholesterolemia. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of 6-month therapy with simvastatin with relatively low dose, 10 mg and 20 mg/day. METHODS: One hundred six patients with hyperlipidemia (triglycerides130 mg/dL) were randomized to receive either simvastatin 10 mg/day (n=43) or 20 mg/day (n=63). Efficacy was determined by measuring changes from baseline in lipid parameters including LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. RESULTS: Of the one hundred six patients randomized to treatment, forty patients were men and sixty-six patients were women. Fifty-five percent of patients had hypertension, nine percent coronary artery disease and thirteen percent type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mean baseline lipid concentrations were 258 (total cholesterol), 201 (triglycerides), 50 (HDL) and 167 mg/dL (LDL). Both 10 mg and 20 mg of simvastatin produced statistically significant improvements in all measured serum lipid parameters (p< 0.001). Compared with 10 mg of simvastatin, 20 mg of simvastatin produced significantly greater (p< 0.001) reductions from baseline LDL cholesterol (34.9 mg/dL vs 20.8 mg/dL). But 10 mg of simvastatin was more effective than 20 mg of simvastatin at reducing triglycerides level (42.7 mg/dL vs 22.3 mg/dL). There was no significant difference in both doses at improving total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol level. Percentage of patients at goal LDL as recommended by NCEP guideline (ATP III) were 81% and 80% for patients in low risk but 35% and 50% for patients in coronary heart disease and its risk equivalents, taking 10 mg and 20 mg/day respectively. Both doses were well tolerated. Only 3 patients (4.8%) in the 20 mg group and one patient (2.3%) in the 10 mg group experienced mild adverse events. Most patients contacted by telephone wanted to take 10 mg of simvastatin. CONCLUSION : In patients with hypercholesterolemia in Korea, both doses (10 mg, 20 mg) of simvastatin were effective in improving serum lipid parameters and well-tolerated. We recommend, considering patients' preference, that 10 mg of simvastatin be intial dosage and in patients with coronary heart disease, higher doses than 20 mg should be prescribed to allow most patients to reach their NCEP target levels.