Application of Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data to the drug utilization studies: A case analysis on atorvastatin

Objective@#The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) is a national drug subsidy program. Given the similarity and comprehensiveness of the Australian PBS and the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) data, these data are increasingly used for pharmacoepidemiological investigations, as well as international comparative studies. This study aims to introduce the various sources of publicly available PBS data and provide a practical guide to researchers conducting drug utilization studies. @*Methods@#We searched literature and websites to detail and compare the collection, structure, components, and characteristics of each PBS data format. We identified different characteristics of the PBS data from the Korean NHI claims data which are mainly owing to their unique co-payment policies and data collection processes. In addition, the utilization and expenditure of atorvastatin, a widely used treatment for hyperlipidemia, were analyzed using two different sources of PBS data and the different results were interpreted. @*Results@#There exist differences in when data were collected or non-subsidized uses of medicine were included among sources of PBS data. Additionally, two countries have different cost sharing methods inmedicine subsidy scheme; co-payment in Australia and co-insurance in Korea. Therefore, it should be noted that prescriptions under co-payment are not included in some data sources in Australia. @*Conclusion@#Despite several analytical challenges, open access and easy data management are the strengths of the PBS data sources. A detailed knowledge of the PBS data can ensure robust methodology and interpretation of pharmacoepidemiological investigations or international comparative studies.

The Composition of Pharmaceutical Expenditure in National Health Insurance and Implications for Reasonable Spending / 보건행정학회지

BACKGROUND: The proportion of pharmaceutical expenditure out of total health-care expenditure in South Korea is high. In 2016, 25.7% of national health insurance (NHI) spending was for pharmaceuticals. Given the increasing demands for the access to newly introduced medicines and following increase in pharmaceutical spending, the management of NHI pharmaceutical expenditure is becoming more difficult. METHODS: This study analyzed the data claimed to NHI for pharmaceutical reimbursement from 2010 to 2016. RESULTS: The policy implications with respect to the trends and problems in spending by drug groups were elicited. First, the proportion of off-patent drugs spending which were treated to chronic disease was much higher than anti-cancer drug spending. Second, the spending to the newly introduced high-costed medicine increased, however, current price-reduction mechanism was not sufficient to manage their expenditure efficiently. CONCLUSION: Our system seems to need several revisions to improve the efficiency of pharmaceutical expenditure and to cope with high-costed medicines. This study suggested that the prices of off-patent drugs need to be regularly readjusted and the Price-Volume Agreement System should be operated more flexibly as well.

Analysis on the Determinants of Therapeutic Materials Expenditure in National Health Insurance / 보건행정학회지

BACKGROUND: The use of therapeutic materials based on new health technology has increased in recent years in the field of medicine, raising concerns for medical practitioners regarding increased spending on the new therapeutic materials amid the rapid population ageing and increase of chronic diseases in Korea. While therapeutic materials have significant importance in the health care system, they have not been given appropriate attention in the academic world of Korea. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that affect the growth of expenditure on therapeutic materials and to derive implications for an effective management considering the diversity of therapeutic materials. METHODS: Using the claims data of the National Health Insurance Services, specific utilization patterns of groups of therapeutic materials in the middle classification level of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2007 to 2014 were analyzed. Four categories (J5083: drug eluting coronary stent, D0302: nonmetallic anchor, K6014: gauze, K6023: gauze) that exhibit unique patterns with respect to price and volume were selected. Then, decomposition analysis was performed to identify the largest contributor to the spending growth by dividing the products into existing, new, and abandoned products for the period between 2010 and 2013. RESULTS: The effect of new products had larger impact on spending growth than the effect of core items in drug eluting coronary stent (J5083) and nonmetallic anchor (D0302). In addition, existing products in general included items priced relatively lower when compared with another item manufactured by the same company. In the gauze category, however, existing products had the largest impact on expenditure and the effect of volume was greater than that in other categories. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that appropriate management measures classified by the characteristics of therapeutic materials are required for therapeutic materials pricing and reassessment in Korea.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Hormonal Treatments for Women with Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor Positive Early Breast Cancer in the Korean Context / 한국유방암학회지

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two aromatase inhibitors for the adjuvant treatment of women with postmenopausal hormone receptor positive early breast cancer, and to find the most reasonable treatment option when the population is stratified by the nodal status. METHODS: A Markov model was developed with defining six Markov states based on breast cancer progression. The annual probabilities of recurrence by adjuvant treatment (anastrozole, letrozole, and tamoxifen) were estimated from the published studies in the overall population and in the node negative and node positive groups. The costs of the defined breast cancer events were measured by the micro-costing method based on the 2009 National Health Insurance Fee Schedule and the third Clinical Guideline of Breast Cancer Treatment. Anastrozole and letrozole were compared with tamoxifen respectively, using the same Markov model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for the overall population and each subgroup were estimated. RESULTS: Anastrozole was more effective and costly than tamoxifen with anastrozole costing an additional Korean Won (KRW) 22,461,689 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Letrozole showed a similar incremental cost of KRW 21,004,142 per QALY. In the node negative group, anastrozole was the most cost-effective with an incremental cost of KRW 19,717,770 per QALY, while letrozole was the most cost-effective with an incremental cost of KRW 8,150,512 per QALY for the node positive group. The sensitivity analysis showed that these results were robust. CONCLUSION: The subgroup analysis clearly demonstrated which treatment was superior among the aromatase inhibitors in terms of the cost-effectiveness. Such a finding was not confirmed for the case of the overall population. The implication of this study is that the decision makers should be careful when generalizing the cost-effectiveness results. The stratified analysis in this context may help reach a reasonable decision for allocating medical resources.