High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Can Be Effective for Patients in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia: a Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Usually, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is indicated for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Although only a few researches have examined the effectiveness of HFNC therapy for respiratory failure with hypercapnia, this therapy is often performed under such conditions for various reasons. We investigated the effectiveness of HFNC therapy for AHRF patients with hypercapnia compared to those without hypercapnia.METHODS: All consecutive patients receiving HFNC therapy between January 2012 and June 2018 at a university hospital were enrolled and classified into nonhypercapnic and hypercapnic groups. We compared the outcomes of both groups and adjusted the outcomes with propensity score matching.RESULTS: A total of 862 patients were enrolled, of which 202 were included in the hypercapnic group. HFNC weaning success rates were higher, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality was lower in the hypercapnic group than in the nonhypercapnic group (all P < 0.05). However, no statistical differences in HFNC weaning success (adjusted P = 0.623, matched P = 0.593), ICU mortality (adjusted P = 0.463, matched P = 0.195), and hospital mortality (adjusted P = 0.602, matched P = 0.579) were noted from the propensity-adjusted and propensity-matched analyses. Additionally, in the propensity score-matched subgroup analysis (according to chronic lung diseases and causes of HFNC application), there was also no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups.CONCLUSION: In AHRF with underlying conditions, HFNC therapy might be helpful for patients with hypercapnia. Large prospective and randomized controlled trials are required for firm conclusions.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Can Be Effective for Patients in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia: a Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND@#Usually, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is indicated for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Although only a few researches have examined the effectiveness of HFNC therapy for respiratory failure with hypercapnia, this therapy is often performed under such conditions for various reasons. We investigated the effectiveness of HFNC therapy for AHRF patients with hypercapnia compared to those without hypercapnia.@*METHODS@#All consecutive patients receiving HFNC therapy between January 2012 and June 2018 at a university hospital were enrolled and classified into nonhypercapnic and hypercapnic groups. We compared the outcomes of both groups and adjusted the outcomes with propensity score matching.@*RESULTS@#A total of 862 patients were enrolled, of which 202 were included in the hypercapnic group. HFNC weaning success rates were higher, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality was lower in the hypercapnic group than in the nonhypercapnic group (all P < 0.05). However, no statistical differences in HFNC weaning success (adjusted P = 0.623, matched P = 0.593), ICU mortality (adjusted P = 0.463, matched P = 0.195), and hospital mortality (adjusted P = 0.602, matched P = 0.579) were noted from the propensity-adjusted and propensity-matched analyses. Additionally, in the propensity score-matched subgroup analysis (according to chronic lung diseases and causes of HFNC application), there was also no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups.@*CONCLUSION@#In AHRF with underlying conditions, HFNC therapy might be helpful for patients with hypercapnia. Large prospective and randomized controlled trials are required for firm conclusions.

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy Can Be Effective for Patients in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia: a Retrospective, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND@#Usually, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is indicated for de novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Although only a few researches have examined the effectiveness of HFNC therapy for respiratory failure with hypercapnia, this therapy is often performed under such conditions for various reasons. We investigated the effectiveness of HFNC therapy for AHRF patients with hypercapnia compared to those without hypercapnia.@*METHODS@#All consecutive patients receiving HFNC therapy between January 2012 and June 2018 at a university hospital were enrolled and classified into nonhypercapnic and hypercapnic groups. We compared the outcomes of both groups and adjusted the outcomes with propensity score matching.@*RESULTS@#A total of 862 patients were enrolled, of which 202 were included in the hypercapnic group. HFNC weaning success rates were higher, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality was lower in the hypercapnic group than in the nonhypercapnic group (all P < 0.05). However, no statistical differences in HFNC weaning success (adjusted P = 0.623, matched P = 0.593), ICU mortality (adjusted P = 0.463, matched P = 0.195), and hospital mortality (adjusted P = 0.602, matched P = 0.579) were noted from the propensity-adjusted and propensity-matched analyses. Additionally, in the propensity score-matched subgroup analysis (according to chronic lung diseases and causes of HFNC application), there was also no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups.@*CONCLUSION@#In AHRF with underlying conditions, HFNC therapy might be helpful for patients with hypercapnia. Large prospective and randomized controlled trials are required for firm conclusions.

Concordance between the underlying causes of death on death certificates written by three emergency physicians

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the concordance between the underlying causes of death (UCOD) on the death certificates written by three emergency physicians (EPs). We investigated errors on the death certificates committed by each EP.METHODS: This study included 106 patients issued a death certificate in the emergency department of an academic hospital. Three EPs reviewed the medical records retrospectively and completed 106 death certificates independently. The selection of the UCOD on the death certificates by each EP (EP-UCOD) was based on the general principle or selection rules. The gold standard UCOD (GS-UCOD) was determined for each patient by unanimous consent between three EPs. We also compared between the EP-UCOD and the GS-UCOD. In addition, we compared between UCODs of three EPs. The errors on the death certificates were investigated by each EP.RESULTS: The rates of concordance between EP-UCOD and the GS-UCOD were 86%, 81%, and 67% for EP-A, EP-B, and EP-C, respectively. The concordance rates between EP-A and EP-B were the highest overall percent agreement (0.783), and those between EP-A and EP-C were the lowest overall percent agreement (0.651). Although each EP had differences in the errors they committed, none of them listed the mode of dying as UCOD.CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that each EP wrote death certificates indicating different causes of death for the same decedents; however, the three EPs made fewer errors on the patients’ death certificates compared with those reported in previous studies.

Achievements, Problems, and Future Direction of the Quality Control Program for Special Periodic Health Examination Agencies in Republic of Korea

The ultimate goal of the quality control program for special periodic health examination agencies is to diagnose the health condition of a worker correctly, based on accurate examination and analysis skills, leading to protect the worker’s health. The quality control program on three areas, chemical analysis for biological monitoring since 1995, and pneumoconiosis, audiometric testing since 1996, has contributed to improve the reliability of occupational health screenings by improving the issues including standardization of testing methods, tools, diagnostic opinions, and reliability of analysis for biological monitoring. It has contributed to improving the reliability of occupational health monitoring by rectifying the following issues associated with previous monitoring: absence of standardized testing methods, testing tools that are not upgraded, mismatching diagnostic opinions, and unreliable results of biological specimen analysis. Nevertheless, there are issues in need of further improvement such as lack of expertise or the use of inappropriate method for health examination, and passive and unwilling participation in the quality control. We suggested solutions to these problems for each area of quality control program. Above all, it is essential to provide active support for health examiners to develop their expertise, while encouraging all the health screening agencies, employers, and workers to develop the desire to improve the system and to maintain the relevance.

Analysis of Errors on Death Certificate for Trauma Related Death

PURPOSE@#This study was to investigate errors of death certificate (DC) issued for patients with trauma.@*METHODS@#A retrospective review for DC issued after death related to trauma at a training hospital trauma center was conducted. Errors on DC were classified into major and minor errors depending on their influence on the process of selecting the cause of death (COD). All errors were compared depending on the place of issue of DC, medical doctors who wrote the DC, and the number of lines filled up for COD of DC.@*RESULTS@#Of a total 140 DCs, average numbers of major and minor errors per DC were 0.8 and 3.7, respectively. There were a total of 2.8 errors for DCs issued at the emergency department (ED) and 5.4 errors for DCs issued beyond ED. The most common major error was more than one COD on a single line for DCs issued at the ED and incompatible casual relation between CODs for DCs issued beyond ED. The number of major errors was 0.5 for emergency physician and 0.8 for trauma surgeon and neurosurgeon. Total errors by the number of lines filled up for COD were the smallest (3.1) for two lines and the largest (6.0) for four lines.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Numbers of total errors and major errors on DCs related to trauma only were 4 and 0.8, respectively. As more CODs were written, more errors were found.

The factors affecting the level of urgency in the frequent users of the emergency department

OBJECTIVE@#study was conducted to identify patients who actually require medical treatment in the frequent users of the emergency department (ED) and evaluate the factors affecting the level of urgency by Korean Triage and Acuity Scale.@*METHODS@#We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of frequent users who used more than four times a year to the ED in 2015. They were triaged on every use of ED and divided into non-urgent group and urgent group based on an average triage scale of three. The characteristics were compared between both groups.@*RESULTS@#The total 443 patients were frequent users and they used the ED 2,944 times. The urgent group included 92 patients, and their median number of ED uses were 4 times. The urgent group was older and higher rate of male than the non-urgent group. The more patients suffered from medical diseases such as diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, other heart disease, lung disease, and kidney disease in the urgent group. There was no difference in education, and socioeconomic status, and ratio uses with same symptoms in both groups. At the end of the study two years later, 55% of the urgent group died.@*CONCLUSION@#The urgent group consists of 92 patients (21%) of the frequent emergent department users. The factors affecting the level of urgency are male sex, cerebrovascular disease, other heart disease, lung disease, and kidney disease as medical history. On the other hand, the psychiatric history and other minor diseases are factors affecting reversely the level of urgency.

Are Registration of Disease Codes for Adult Anaphylaxis Accurate in the Emergency Department?

PURPOSE: There has been active research on anaphylaxis, but many study subjects are limited to patients registered with anaphylaxis codes. However, anaphylaxis codes tend to be underused. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of anaphylaxis code registration and the clinical characteristics of accurate and inaccurate anaphylaxis registration in anaphylactic patients. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated the medical records of adult patients who visited the university hospital emergency department between 2012 and 2016. The study subjects were divided into the groups with accurate and inaccurate anaphylaxis codes registered under anaphylaxis and other allergy-related codes and symptom-related codes, respectively. RESULTS: Among 211,486 patients, 618 (0.29%) had anaphylaxis. Of these, 161 and 457 were assigned to the accurate and inaccurate coding groups, respectively. The average age, transportation to the emergency department, past anaphylaxis history, cancer history, and the cause of anaphylaxis differed between the 2 groups. Cutaneous symptom manifested more frequently in the inaccurate coding group, while cardiovascular and neurologic symptoms were more frequently observed in the accurate group. Severe symptoms and non-alert consciousness were more common in the accurate group. Oxygen supply, intubation, and epinephrine were more commonly used as treatments for anaphylaxis in the accurate group. Anaphylactic patients with cardiovascular symptoms, severe symptoms, and epinephrine use were more likely to be accurately registered with anaphylaxis disease codes. CONCLUSIONS: In case of anaphylaxis, more patients were registered inaccurately under other allergy-related codes and symptom-related codes rather than accurately under anaphylaxis disease codes. Cardiovascular symptoms, severe symptoms, and epinephrine treatment were factors associated with accurate registration with anaphylaxis disease codes in patients with anaphylaxis.

Severe Injuries from Low-height Falls in the Elderly Population

BACKGROUND: Falls from low-height can cause severe injuries in the elderly population. This study was conducted to determine characteristics of injuries from low-height falls. METHODS: We retrospectively review surveillance data on injured patients who presented to six emergency departments from January 2011 to December 2015. Study subjects were divided into severe group and non-severe group based on severity of injury. The general and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups and analyzed factors related with severe injuries. RESULTS: Of 1,190 elderly patients, severe group comprised 82 patients (7%). The severe group was 2 years younger than the non-severe group. In the severe group, 61% was men and 34% in the non-severe group. In the non-severe, the injuries more commonly occurred at residential facilities and indoors than those in the severe group. Paid work during injury occurrence was 15%, and the more patients presented with non-alert consciousness in the severe group. The most common regions of major injury were head and neck in the severe group. CONCLUSION: Paid work, non-alert consciousness, and major injury to head and neck are relating factors to severe injuries in the elderly population.

The effect of education on ‘how to write the death certificate’ for resident trainees of the emergency department

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the most common errors on death certificates written by resident trainees of the emergency department and evaluated the effects of education on how to write a death certificate. METHODS: A casebook of 31 deaths was prepared based on actual death cases in the emergency room in 2016. Ten residents completed 31 death certificates for the death casebook without any prior notice and then received education on ‘How to write the death certificate.’ They completed the death certificates again for the same casebook after receiving the education and the number of errors on all death certificates was again determined and divided into major and minor errors. The average number of error types was compared before and after the education. RESULTS: Major errors occurred in 55% of all death certificates, but decreased to 32% after education. Minor errors decreased from 81% before education to 54% after education. The most common major error was ‘unacceptable cause of death’ (mean±standard deviation [SD], 10.2±8.2), and the most common minor error was ‘absence of time interval’ (mean±SD, 24.0±7.7), followed by ‘absence of other significant conditions’ (mean±SD, 14.6±6.1) before education. CONCLUSION: Education on ‘how to write a death certificate’ can help reduce errors on death certificates and improve the quality of death certificates.

Accuracy of Disease Codes Registered for Anaphylaxis at Emergency Department

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate the frequency and clinical characteristics of anaphylaxis patients who are registered inaccurately with other disease codes. METHODS: Study subjects presenting at the emergency department (ED) were retrospectively collected using disease codes to search for anaphylaxis patients in a previous studies. The study group was divided into an accurate and inaccurate group according to whether disease codes were accurately registered as anaphylaxis codes. RESULTS: Among 266 anaphylaxis patients, 144 patients (54%) received inaccurate codes. Cancer was the most common comorbidity, and the radio-contrast media was the most common cause of anaphylaxis in the accurate group. Cutaneous and respiratory symptoms manifested more frequently in the inaccurate group, while cardiovascular and neurological symptoms were more frequent in the accurate group. Blood pressure was lower, and shock and non-alert consciousness were more common in the accurate group. Administration of intravenous fluid and epinephrine use were more frequent in the accurate group. Anaphylaxis patients with a history of cancer, shock, and epinephrine use were more likely to be registered as anaphylaxis codes accurately, but patients with respiratory symptoms were more likely to be registered with other disease codes. CONCLUSION: In cases of anaphylaxis, the frequency of inaccurately registered disease codes was higher than that of accurately registered codes. Anaphylaxis patients who were not treated with epinephrine at the ED who did not have a history of cancer, but had respiratory symptoms were at increased risk of being registered with disease codes other than anaphylaxis codes.

Accuracy for registration of disease codes in pediatric anaphylaxis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to survey the accuracy of registration as anaphylaxis codes and the clinical characteristics of anaphylaxis registered correctly and incorrectly in pediatric anaphylaxis. METHODS: This study was conducted retrospectively using the medical records of patients under 15 years who visited a training hospital Emergency Department (ED) for 5 years. The study subjects were divided into the correct group (registered as anaphylaxis codes correctly) and the incorrect group (registered as other anaphylaxis related codes). RESULTS: Of the 133 patients, 14 belonged to the correct group and 119 to the incorrect group. The median age of the correct group was 9 years old and that of the incorrect group was 2 years old. Sex, transportation to the ED, elapsed time from exposure to ED arrival, past history of allergy, causes of anaphylaxis except drug, severity of symptom, mental status, and antihistamine use were not different between the 2 groups. Drugs as the cause of anaphylaxis and cardiovascular/neurologic symptoms were more common in the correct group. Gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent in the incorrect group. Intravenous fluid, steroid, bronchodilator, and epinephrine were more commonly used as the treatment for anaphylaxis in the correct group. The pediatric patients treated with epinephrine tended to be registered anaphylaxis correctly. CONCLUSION: More patients were registered incorrectly as other anaphylaxis-related disease codes rather than correctly as the anaphylaxis disease codes in pediatric anaphylaxis. Epinephrine use was the associated factor for being registered correctly as the anaphylaxis disease codes in pediatric anaphylaxis.

Feasibility and Safety of Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia in Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Prospective Pilot Study

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) improves the neurological outcome in patients after cardiac arrest and neonatal hypoxic brain injury. We studied the safety and feasibility of mild TH in patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) after successful treatment. Patients were allocated randomly to either the TH group (34.5°C) or control group after successful clipping or coil embolization. Eleven patients received TH for 48 hours followed by 48 hours of slow rewarming. Vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), functional outcome, mortality, and safety profiles were compared between groups. We enrolled 22 patients with poor-grade SAH (Hunt & Hess Scale 4, 5 and modified Fisher Scale 3, 4). In the TH group, 10 of 11 (90.9%) patients had a core body temperature of 95% of the 48-hour treatment period. Fewer patients in the TH than control group (n = 11, each) had symptomatic vasospasms (18.1% vs. 36.4%, respectively) and DCI (36.3% vs. 45.6%, respectively), but these differences were not statistically significant. At 3 months, 54.5% of the TH group had a good-to-moderate functional outcome (0–3 on the modified Rankin Scale [mRS]) compared with 9.0% in the control group (P = 0.089). Mortality at 1 month was 36.3% in the control group compared with 0.0% in the TH group (P = 0.090). Mild TH is feasible and can be safely used in patients with poor-grade SAH. Additionally, it may reduce the risk of vasospasm and DCI, improving the functional outcomes and reducing mortality. A larger randomized controlled trial is warranted.