ABSTRACT
In acute colonic pseudo-obstruction(Ogilvie's syndrome, 1948), there is no distal obstruction but colonic obstruction symptom and distended colon is shown radiologicaly and clinically. The etiology of this syndrome are complex of any medical and surgical problem. Elderly patients who are undergoing CAPD have multiple medical problems. But among them only one case which was diagnosed with this syndrome was reported in Korea. Neostigmine is unstable medicine due to muscarinic effects if neostigmine(anticholinesterase inhibitor) has side effects to the CAPD patients with multiple medical problems, it can be fatal. We use pyridostigmine, which has less muscarinic effect, and has similiar potency compared to neostigmine to acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, and thus achieved radiological improvement.
Subject(s)
Aged , Humans , Cholinergic Agents , Colon , Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction , Korea , Neostigmine , Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory , Pyridostigmine BromideABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare non-breath-hold T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) MR imaging with three types of breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging (breath-hold TSE [BHTSE], half-Fourier single- shot TSE [HASTE], and true-fast imaging with steady-state precession [FISP]) for hepatic lesion detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2-weighted MR images obtained using the above with the four sequences in 38 patients with 53 solid malignant and 90 non-solid benign hepatic lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Images were compared quantitatively (lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio and lesion detectability) and qualitatively (conspicuity of lesion and artifact). Statistical analysis involved the paired t-test for quantitative evaluation and Wilcoxon's signed rank test for qualitative evaluation. RESULTS: The values of lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios and lesion conspicuity for solid malignant hepatic lesions were better with non-breath-hold TSE imaging than with the three breath-hold T2-weighted sequences (p .05), and lesion detectability for non-solid benign lesions was similar (94% and 98%, compared with 91% and 96 %). CONCLUSION: In the cases of solid malignant hepatic lesions, the three breath-hold T2-weighted sequences were inferior to non-breath-hold TSE with regard to lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio and lesion detectability. Non-breath-hold TSE imaging should thus not be replaced by breath-hold T2-weighted imaging.
Subject(s)
Humans , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare non-breath-hold T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) MR imaging with three types of breath-hold T2-weighted MR imaging (breath-hold TSE [BHTSE], half-Fourier single- shot TSE [HASTE], and true-fast imaging with steady-state precession [FISP]) for hepatic lesion detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: T2-weighted MR images obtained using the above with the four sequences in 38 patients with 53 solid malignant and 90 non-solid benign hepatic lesions were retrospectively analyzed. Images were compared quantitatively (lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio and lesion detectability) and qualitatively (conspicuity of lesion and artifact). Statistical analysis involved the paired t-test for quantitative evaluation and Wilcoxon's signed rank test for qualitative evaluation. RESULTS: The values of lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratios and lesion conspicuity for solid malignant hepatic lesions were better with non-breath-hold TSE imaging than with the three breath-hold T2-weighted sequences (p .05), and lesion detectability for non-solid benign lesions was similar (94% and 98%, compared with 91% and 96 %). CONCLUSION: In the cases of solid malignant hepatic lesions, the three breath-hold T2-weighted sequences were inferior to non-breath-hold TSE with regard to lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio and lesion detectability. Non-breath-hold TSE imaging should thus not be replaced by breath-hold T2-weighted imaging.