The optimal duration of ischemic preconditioning for renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning for different periods of time and to elucidate the optimal safe ischemic preconditioning time for renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in mice. METHODS: A total of 25 male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into 5 groups (sham, I/R, ischemic preconditioning [IP]-3, IP-5, and IP-7 groups), in which the kidney was preconditioned with IP of various durations and then subjected to I/R injury (the last 3 groups). To induce renal ischemia, the left renal pedicle was occluded with a nontraumatic microaneurysm clamp for 30 minutes followed by reperfusion for 24 hours. The effects of IP on renal I/R injury were evaluated in terms of renal function, tubular necrosis, apoptotic cell death and inflammatory cytokines. RESULTS: Results indicated that BUN and creatinine (Cr) levels increased significantly in the I/R group, but the elevations were significantly lower in IP groups, especially in the IP-5 group. Histological analysis revealed that kidney injury was markedly decreased in the IP-5 group compared with the I/R group, as evidenced by reduced renal necrosis/apoptosis. In addition, IP significantly inhibited gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) and chemokines (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1). Western blot analysis indicated that the expression levels of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) were upregulated in the I/R group, while expression was inhibited in the IP groups. CONCLUSION: Five-minute IP had the greatest protective effect against I/R injury.

A Comparative Analysis of Single Umbilical Tangential Incision vs. Conventional Three-port Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair

PURPOSE: We have explored the question of what benefits SUTI-TEP can provide over conventional three-port TEP (C-TEP) surgery for the treatment of inguinal hernia. METHODS: One hundred forty cases (70 SUTI-TEP and 70 C-TEP) were reviewed in this study. SUTI-TEP procedure was carried out with SILS™ port as we reported before. Patient demographics and perioperative outcomes of SUTI-TEP were analyzed and compared with those of C-TEP. RESULTS: There was no conversion to open surgery or C-TEP in SUTI-TEP group. Median VAS immediate postoperatively was slightly higher in SUTI-TEP group, but it was statistically significant. POD 7th day pain after surgery were similar in both groups. Regarding the length of operation time, SUTI-TEP group (71.2 min) was significantly longer than that of the C-TEP group (41 min) (p<0.001). There was no major morbidity or mortality postoperatively in either group. There was also no recurrence or chronic pain during follow up. Patient overall satisfaction including cosmetic outcome was excellent in SUTI-TEP group. CONCLUSION: Although the longer operation time tends to be required, SUTI-TEP can provide better cosmesis and patient satisfaction, and also safety. That may be good indicator of the success of after surgery. Also we should not presume that one large incision causes less pain than small multiple incision because it is just single one. If there is more pain in one single wound, we should find the solution through the innovation of technology or preventive measures.

Effectiveness of Breast MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Preoperative Staging of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma versus Ductal Carcinoma / 한국유방암학회지

PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) for the preoperative staging of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast and compared the results with those of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). METHODS: The study included pathologically proven 32 ILCs and 73 IDCs. We compared clinical and histopathological characteristics and the diagnostic performances of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the primary mass, additional ipsilateral and/or contralateral lesion(s), and axillary lymph node metastasis between the ILC and IDC groups. RESULTS: Primary ILCs were greater in size, but demonstrated lower maximum standardized uptake values than IDCs. All primary masses were detected on MRI. The detection rate for ILCs (75.0%) was lower than that for IDCs (83.6%) on 18F-FDG PET/CT, but the difference was not significant. For additional ipsilateral lesion(s), the sensitivities and specificities of MRI were 87.5% and 58.3% for ILC and 100.0% and 66.7% for IDC, respectively; whereas the sensitivities and specificities of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 0% and 91.7% for ILC and 37.5% and 94.7% for IDC, respectively. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT for ipsilateral lesion(s) was significantly lower in the ILC group than the IDC group. The sensitivity for ipsilateral lesion(s) was significantly higher with MRI; however, specificity was higher with 18F-FDG PET/CT in both tumor groups. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance for additional contralateral lesion(s) or axillary lymph node metastasis on MRI or 18F-FDG PET/CT for ILC versus IDC. CONCLUSION: The MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT detection rates for the primary cancer do not differ between the ILC and IDC groups. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrates lower sensitivity for primary and additional ipsilateral lesions, it shows higher specificity for additional ipsilateral lesions, and could play a complementary role in the staging of ILC as well as IDC.