Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics ; : 128-131, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-742022

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the marginal discrepancy of full-arch frameworks in implant-supported prostheses fabricated using pre-sintered soft alloy (PSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Full-arch metal frameworks were fabricated on the edentulous implant model using casting alloy (CA), fully-sintered hard alloy (FHA), and PSA (n = 4 in each group). To evaluate the misfit of the framework to the abutments, the absolute marginal discrepancy (AMD) values of the frameworks were measured in cross-sectional images that had been drawn as part of the triple-scan protocol. The AMD values were compared among the tested alloy groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test, with a post hoc Mann-Whitney U test (α=.05). RESULTS: The FHA and PSA groups showed lower marginal discrepancies than the CA group (P < .001). However, the FHA group did not differ significantly from the PSA group. CONCLUSION: Soft alloy milling is comparable to hard alloy milling, and it is more precise than casting in terms of the marginal fit of implant-supported, full-arch prostheses.


Subject(s)
Alloys , Pilot Projects , Prostheses and Implants
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL