CT Findings of Foreign Bodies in the Chest: A Pictorial Essay

The most common causes of tracheobronchial foreign bodies are peanuts in children, and meat and dentures in adults. The most common causes of esophageal foreign bodies are coins in children and meat in adults. It is possible to diagnose a foreign body by visualization on a chest radiograph, if the foreign bodies are radioopaque. However, if the foreign bodies are radiolucent and the patients do not remember the history of aspiration, it is important to evaluate CT findings for foreign bodies and their complications. We describe the CT findings of various thoracic foreign bodies in children and adults.

Risk Factors of Pneumothorax in Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of the Lung

PURPOSE: Percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy is known to be a useful diagnostic method for the diagnosis of various pulmonary diseases. Its diagnostic yield is high, and it is safe, but complications such as pneumothorax can occasionally occur. We reviewed the complications arising after needle aspiration biopsy and analyzed the risk factors of pneumothorax. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records and radiographic studies of 157 patients with various pulmonary diseases who underwent needle aspiration biopsy of the lung between 1990 and 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical features, treatment, and courses of complications were reviewed, and risk factors of pneumothorax such as depth and size of lesion, diameter of needle, number of punctures, and obstructive pulmonary abnormalities were analyzed. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 40 of 157 cases (25.5%), namely pneumothorax in 26 (16.6%), hemoptysis in 11 (7%), hemothorax in two (1.3%), and recurrence of malignancy at the site of aspiration in one (0.6%). When the patients were divided into three groups according to depth of lesion, there were significant difference in the incidence of pneumothorax ; the results were as follows : less than 2cm, 12.9% ; between 2 and 4cm, 24.1% ; and larger than 4cm, 57.1% (p<0.05). In pulmonary function testing, FVC (forced vital capacity) of patients with pneumothorax was less than that of patients without (2.6+/-0.9L vs 3.1+/-0.8L, p<0.05), but FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), FEV 1% (percentage of predicted FEV1), FEV1/FVC,and FVC%(percentage of predicted FVC) were not different between the two groups. The incidence of pneumothorax in patients with pleura-attached lesion (9%) was lower than that of those with non-attached lesion (26%, p=0.01). The age of patients, size of lesion, diameter of the needle, guidance methods and number of aspirations showed no significant relationship with pneumothorax. CONCLUSION: In needle aspiration biopsy of the lung, depth of lesion and passage of a needle through aerated lung are significant risk factors of pneumothorax.

The Usefulness of Esophagogram with Marshmallow Bolus in Patients with Esophageal-Related Symptoms

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of the esophagogram using marshmallow bolus in the evaluation of the causes of variable esophageal-related symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Esophagograms using marshmallow bolus were performed on 44 patients with esophageal-related symptoms and on ten normal volunteers. Video fluoroscopic studies were also made. Patients were classified into three groups according to their esophageal-related symptoms ; those with dysphagia, those with globus symptom, and those with chest pain. Abnormal findings on an esophagogram with marshmallow were graded into three categories ; mild, moderate, and severe. Provocation of the same symptom wasalso evaluated. Esophageal manometric studies were performed on 16 patients and those results were compared with the results obtained from the esophagogram using marshmallow bolus. RESULTS: The provocation rate of the same symptom was 33% in the first group, 47% in the second, and 24% in the third. The provocation rate was highest inthe second group. The provocation rate was also higher in patients with a severe degree of abnormality on anesophagogram using marshmallow bolus. Where there were abnormal findings, an esophagogram using marshmallow bolus showed a higher abnormality rate than did a conventional esophagogram. In cases showing abnormal findings on the esophageal manometric study, an esophagogram using marshmallow bolus showed a higher provocation rate and more severe abnormality than in cases showing normal findings on manometric study. CONCLUSION: An esophagogram using marshmallow bolus will a useful radiologic screening modality for the evaluation of patients with esophageal-related symptoms.