ABSTRACT
Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for ampullary adenomas achieves cure rates ranging from 76% to 90%, and recurrence rates are as high as 33%. If remnant or recurrent lesions after prior EP are endoscopically visible and are not suspected of intraductal extension into the biliary or pancreatic duct, repeated snaring and cutting can be performed until all visible lesions are completely resected. However, endoscopic ablative therapies, particularly argon plasma coagulation, can be attempted for tiny or uncertain remnant and recurrent lesions. In addition, intraductal radiofrequency ablation has recently been attempted for residual intraductal lesions after EP at several institutions. Although still under investigation, it has shown some promise. It might be offered as an alternative to surgery, particularly in patients who are unfit for surgery or those who refuse to undergo surgery.
ABSTRACT
Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) for ampullary adenomas achieves cure rates ranging from 76% to 90%, and recurrence rates are as high as 33%. If remnant or recurrent lesions after prior EP are endoscopically visible and are not suspected of intraductal extension into the biliary or pancreatic duct, repeated snaring and cutting can be performed until all visible lesions are completely resected. However, endoscopic ablative therapies, particularly argon plasma coagulation, can be attempted for tiny or uncertain remnant and recurrent lesions. In addition, intraductal radiofrequency ablation has recently been attempted for residual intraductal lesions after EP at several institutions. Although still under investigation, it has shown some promise. It might be offered as an alternative to surgery, particularly in patients who are unfit for surgery or those who refuse to undergo surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are controversies for the management of esophageal neoplasia due to its variety among countries. In this study, we tried to uncover the different managements on esophageal neoplasia between Korea, Singapore, and Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered ten questionnaires to Korean, Japanese, and Singaporean endoscopists. The questionnaire consisted of endoscopic images from ten different esophageal neoplasms. RESULTS: For Barrett esophagus (BE) with adenocarcinoma (P=0.013) and well-differentiated- type squamous cell carcinoma (P=0.007), all (100%) of the Japanese endoscopists selected endoscopic resection as treatment, whereas 25~40% of the Korean and Singaporean endoscopists selected surgical resection. For BE with low grade dysplasia (P=0.002) and flat-type squamous dysplasia (P<0.001), observation without endoscopic treatment was preferred in Japan, whereas endoscopic treatment was preferred in Korea and Singapore. Similar findings between three countries were; (i) medication for BE, (ii) endoscopic treatment for BE with high grade dysplasia and elevated-type squamous dysplasia, and (iii) operation for moderately-differentiated or poorly-differentiated typed SCC. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey addresses different managements on esophageal neoplasia between Korea, Singapore, and Japan. More advanced or aggressive treatments are preferred in Korea and Singapore than in Japan for the management of BE with LGD, flat-type squamous dysplasia, BE with adenocarcinoma, and WD-typed SCC.