Usefulness of Intraductal Secretin Test in Assessing Exocrine Pancreatic Function in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis / 대한소화기내시경학회지

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The duodenal intubation test (duodenal secretin test; DST) is now considered the 'gold standard' test of exocrine pancreatic function in detecting exocrine pancreatic dysfunction in patients with chronic pancreatitis. However, the DST has not been widely used, because it is time-consuming, invasive, and labor-intensive. On the other hand, intraductal secretin test (IDST) with endoscopic retrograde cannulation of the main pancreatic duct has been showed similar diagnostic efficiency compared with DST. We assessed the clinical usefulness of IDST and investigated parameters for assessing impaired pancreatic function of IDST. METHODS: Pure pancreatic juices were collected from 12 patients with chronic pancreatitis by endoscopic cannulation after a bolus intravenous injection of secretin 100 U, for 15min in three 5-min intervals. Five parameters of IDST were measured, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of IDST evaluated compared with ERP. RESULTS: When we regarded mean-1.5 SD as the lower limits of IDST, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of five parameters to detect chronic pancreatitis were 91.7-100%, 75-87.5%, and 85-90%, respectively. Among five parameters, pancreatic juice secretory volume, bicarbonate concentration, and amylase output showed the highest diagnostic accuracy, followed by lipase output and bicarbonate output. A 10-min collection showed as much information as a 15-min collection. CONCLUSIONS: 10-min intraductal secretin test is useful as the conventional exocrine pancreatic function test in detecting exocrine pancreatic dysfunction in patients with chronic pancreatitis and the most discriminatory parameters are pancreatic juice secretory volume, bicarbonate concentration, and amylase output.

Effects of Interdialytic Interval and Potassium(K) Removal via Dialvsis on the Plasma Potassium Concentration in Maintenance Hemodialysis / 대한신장학회잡지

To evaluate potassium(K) homeostasis during in-terdialytic and dialytic phases in chronic hemodialysis patients, we analyzed pre- and post- dialysis plasma K concentration(n=28) over n week with an interdialytic interval of 7Zhrs, 48hrs(l), and 48hrs(II), respectively, and the quantity of total dialytic K removal via dialysate. The predialysis plasma K at 72h interval(prePK72h: 4.89+/-0.17mEq/L) was significantly higher than those at 48h interval(prePK48h-I: 4.57+/-0.15mEq/L, and prePK48h-II: 4.40+/-15mEq/L) (p=0.000, p=0.000). 10.7% in prePK72h were categorized into severe hyperkalemia more than 6.0mEq/L, but none in prePK48h-I, II(p=0.000, p=0.000). In contrast no difference between 72-h and 42-h intervals was found in the postdialysis plasma K(postPK72h: 3.59+/-0.07 vs postPK48h-I : 3.530+/-08mEq/L, p>0.05) and in the quantity of total dialytic K removal via dialysate(delta Ktota172h : 74+/-2.6 vs delta Ktota148h-I:71+/-2.2mEq, p>0.05). On approach to this with two-compartment model, there was significant difference in dialytic K removal from ECF(delta Kecf72h:22.2+/-1.6 vs delta Kecf48h-I:17.7+/-1.6mEq, p0.05). In all 28 patients, age, sex and body weight were not correlated with either pre- and post- plasma K levels or total K removal per kg body weight. In conclusion, the majority of dialytic K removal is from the replenishment of the ICF potassium and it has rather constant feature in that there was no autoregulatory increment even with the higher predialysis plasma K concentration. So the plasma K concentration on chronic maintenace hemodialysis is more dependent on the potassium gain during interdialytic phase than the potassium removal during dialytic phase. Also it is reasonable to restrict dietary K intake and apply K-exalate orientating to the interdialytic phase of 72hrs because severe hyperkalemia is rare in that of 48hrs.