demographic and clinical characteristics of leprosy in Saudi Arabia

Leprosy is a chronic disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Although the occurrence of leprosy has declined in Saudi Arabia, it has not yet been eradicated. To our knowledge, this descriptive retrospective study is the first to assess the clinical presentation of leprosy at the time of diagnosis in Saudi Arabia. All study subjects were leprosy patients admitted to Ibn Sina hospital, the only referral hospital for leprosy in Saudi Arabia, between January 2000 and May 2012. A total of 164 subjects, the majority of whom [65%] were between 21 and 50 years of age, were included, and the male-to-female ratio was 2.8:1. Of these 164 patients, 63% were Saudis, and 77% of all admitted patients were from the western region. Lepromatous leprosy was observed most frequently [33%], and 31% of cases had a positive history of close contact with leprosy. At the time of diagnosis, 84% of all subjects presented with skin manifestation. The prevalence of neurological deficit at the time of diagnosis was 87%. Erythema nodosum leprosum [E.N.L.] developed in only 10% of all subjects. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical characteristics pertaining to each type of leprosy in the region, and training courses in caring for and diagnosing patients with leprosy should be organized for health workers

Implementation of the national asthma management guidelines in the emergency department

The national protocol for asthma management was released in 1995. There has been no national investigation to compare the actual care delivered at the Emergency Department to those recommended by these guidelines: To compare the documented management of acute bronchial asthma at the Emergency Room [ER] with the Saudi National Guidelines Retrospective analyses of a total of 150 ER records, of patients with a diagnosis of asthma over a one year period [January through to December 2000], at King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Documentation of the history, indices of severity, treatment given, pre-discharge assessment and prescriptions were compared to the nationally recommended management. History of the present attack, its duration, frequency of b-agonist use and nocturnal symptoms were documented in less than 50% of patients. Previous ER visits and hospitalization, peak flow rate and accessory muscle use were similarly recorded in less than 50% of patients whereas intensive care unit admission and intubation were documented in less than 15% of asthmatics. Steroids were given to only 46% of patients with acute asthma who visited the Emergency Department. Pre-discharge clinical assessment and peak flow readings were documented in 48% and 29%. Only 64% of patients were given a follow up appointment. The documented treatment of patients with an acute asthmatic episode at the ER varies significantly from what is recommended by the National and International Asthma Management Guidelines. Failure to implement Asthma Guidelines probably results in an inadequate care of asthmatic patients and raises the urgent need for a National Physician Asthma Education Program