Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
International Journal of Oral Biology ; : 185-190, 2010.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-92233

ABSTRACT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most prevalent pathogens in hospitals. To investigate cross contamination by this bacterium in both dental and medical settings, the pathogens that cause acute pyogenic infection and one of the major microbes responsible for nosocomial infection were isolated from health care providers, nurses and patients. We used VITEK II to measure drug sensitivity, and we further performed biochemical testing, coagulase serotype testing and pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for isolated MRSA colonies. The isolation rate of Staphylococcus aureus from nasal swabs was 75.0% from dental health care providers and 18.8% from the medical health care providers. A total of 10 MRSA strains were isolated from 40 health care providers and 2 patients and the prevalent coagulase serotype from patients and health care providers was VII. The antimicrobial drug resistance and partial PFGE types of the isolated MRSA strains showed a similar pattern. These results suggest that MRSA may be one of the principal causes of nosocomial infection in dental and medical hospitals.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Infective Agents , Coagulase , Cross Infection , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Electrophoresis , Health Personnel , Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcus aureus
2.
International Journal of Oral Biology ; : 7-12, 2010.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-63436

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to investigate the nosocomial infection route of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and explore preventative methods for this pathogen that involve blocking its dispersion. We cultured MRSA from nasal cavity swabs collected between June and July 2008 that we obtained from eight dental healthcare providers, 32 nurses and the sputum specimens of two patients from our hospital. In addition, we used VITEK 2 equipment to measure drug sensitivity, and we further performed biochemical testing and pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to isolate MRSA colonies. The incidence of these bacteria on the nasal swabs was 25.0% from dental clinic healthcare providers, 13.6% from the internal medicine ward nurses and 30.0% from intensive care unit nurses. Moreover, MRSA was detectable in sputum specimens of ward patients. The antimicrobial agents resistance and partial PFGE types of MRSA showed a similar pattern. We suggest from these analyses that nasal cavity infection by MRSA could occur by cross contamination between healthcare providers and patients which underscores the importance of stringent MRSA management practices.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Infective Agents , Bacteria , Cross Infection , Delivery of Health Care , Dental Clinics , Electrophoresis , Health Personnel , Incidence , Intensive Care Units , Internal Medicine , Methicillin Resistance , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Nasal Cavity , Sputum
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL