Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 33(4): 470-476, July-Aug. 2007. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-465782

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy is well tolerated by patients but the lack of an effective marker to predict pain prevents us from determining pre-procedurally which patient group needs local anesthesia for biopsy and probe pain. Thus in this study, we investigated predictor factors for prostate biopsy and probe insertion pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 71 patients who were undergoing prostate biopsy without anesthesia were included in the study retrospectively. Pain had been assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10). Digital rectal examination (DRE) pain was analyzed for biopsy and probe insertion pain. RESULTS: DRE pain was related to both probe pain and biopsy pain. CONCLUSION: Although level of pain during DRE determines patients in need of local anesthesia, since the number of patients with moderate-severe pain is rather big, it seems efficient in determining the patients in need of additional anesthesia due to probe pain.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anesthesia, Local/methods , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Digital Rectal Examination/adverse effects , Pain/prevention & control , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy, Needle/adverse effects , Digital Rectal Examination/methods , Nerve Block/methods , Pain Measurement , Pain/etiology , Prostate , Prostatic Neoplasms , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL