ABSTRACT
Purpose@#This study aimed to compare a dynamic neuromuscular training program with a static neuromuscular training program for taekwondo players. @*Methods@#This study design was a randomized control trial. Three high school taekwondo teams (taekwondo neuromuscular training [TNT] group, 22; Get Set group, 17; and control group, 24) participated in the study. Get Set group performed a program focused on the static movement, and TNT group performed a program which was modified Get Set to dynamic movement. Control group maintained the existing taekwondo training without any intervention. The intervention group performed 15-minute training three times a week for 6 weeks. Dynamic Postural Stability Index (DPSI) and time-to-boundary test (TTB) tests were performed before and after 6 weeks of training. @*Results@#As a result of DPSI, an interaction effect was observed only in the anterior/posterior stability index of the dominant leg of the TNT and Get Set groups (p＜0.05). However, there was no difference between the TNT and the Get Set groups.As a result of TTB analysis, no statistical effect was observed in all variables of the dominant and non-dominant legs. @*Conclusion@#As a result of conducting 6-week dynamic and static neuromuscular training for taekwondo athletes, the effect of training was found in both the intervention group. However, differences in training effects between groups could not be proved. Therefore, it is necessary to clearly confirm the difference between the two training through long-term follow-up studies.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#Although postural control assessment in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) has been thoroughly examined in the literature, few researchers have studied balance strategy in lateral ankle sprain (LAS) copers, who recover from LAS injury with no symptom progression. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in center of pressure (COP) variables during static and dynamic posture control among LAS copers, patients with CAI, and ankle healthy controls. @*Methods@#This case-control study recruited 20 patients with CAI, 20 LAS copers, and 20 controls. All participants filled out Ankle Instability Instrument and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure questionnaire and performed single-leg static postural control and Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT). @*Results@#LAS copers showed less mediolateral COP range as compared to patients with CAI (p=0.001) and control (p=0.001) during static postural control. Furthermore, LAS copers have less anteroposterior COP standard deviation (SD) (p=0.034), range (p=0.009), velocity (p=0.013) than patients with CAI. Relative to patients with CAI, LAS copers had small mediolateral COP SD (p=0.022) and range (p=0.018) during the posteromedial direction of the SEBT.However, there was no significant difference in both mediolateral and anteroposterior COP variables during anterior and posterolateral directions of the SEBT (p≥ 0.05). @*Conclusion@#Based on these observed results, the authors conclude that greater postural control in LAS copers is one of the movement strategies to prevent recurrent LAS as a defense mechanism.