ABSTRACT
Background: The main objective of prescription pattern analysis is to assess the rationality of drug use. It has been found that cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. This study is to estimate the prescribing pattern and adverse drug reactions in patients with cardiovascular diseases.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted for a period of 2 months in cardiology outpatient department.100 patients who fulfilled the study criteria were observed. The central drug standard control organisation (CDSCO) reporting forms were used for the collection of adverse drug reactions. Causality assessment was done by using the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scoring system and severity assessment by modified Hartwig and Siegel scale.Results: The study group consists of 79% male and 21% females. Average number of drugs per prescription was 4.65. Most commonly prescribed drugs were antiplatelets (32%) followed by statins (18.27%) and the least common were calcium channel blockers (1.72%) and cardiac glycosides (0.86%). A total of 174 adverse drug reactions were reported out of which 24.7% were myalgia due to statins, 15.5% were cough due to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and 14.3% were gastritis due to antiplatelets.Conclusions: Antiplatelets, statins and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors dominated the prescribing pattern. Myalgia, cough, gastritis, insomnia by atorvastatin, enalapril, aspirin, beta blockers respectively were found to be the most commonly reported ADRs among the cardiovascular drugs.
ABSTRACT
Background: Drugs used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis show significant toxicity and morbidity. The objective of the study was to evaluate the nature and incidence of adverse drug reaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis on anti-rheumatic drugs and to assess the causality and severity of the documented adverse drug reactions.Methods: The prospective observational study was done for two months in rheumatology outpatient department. All patients were interviewed for basic details, treatment history and adverse drug reactions and were recorded. Causality assessment and severity assessment of the recorded adverse drug reactions were done.Results: About 283 patients attended the rheumatology out-patient department during the two months period out of which 57 patients had one or more adverse drug reaction. The incidence of adverse drug reaction observed in rheumatology out-patient department to anti rheumatic drug was 20.14%. A total of 145 adverse drug reactions were noted in 57 patients. The most common adverse drug reaction reported was epigastric pain (6.89%) followed by headache and dyslipidemia (6.25%). The most common system associated with adverse drug reaction was gastrointestinal system (29.66%) followed by central nervous system and cardiovascular system (15.86%). Reported adverse drug reactions were assessed for causality and maximum belonged to probable (66.9%). Severity assessment revealed that most of the adverse drug reactions were mild (74.48%) in nature.Conclusions: Active surveillance for adverse drug reactions to anti rheumatic drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis will allow early detection of adverse drug reactions and timely intervention to provide maximum benefit to the patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: To evaluate the impact of type-II diabetes mellitus on cognitive function and to assess the factors associated with impaired function.Methods: This prospective study compared 100 type-II diabetic people attending the diabetic clinic of Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital with another 100 membered control group. The study group was selected randomly between the age group of 45-65 years. A neuro-cognitive assessment was done using Standardized Mini Mental State Examination (SMMSE), which is a simple and reliable screening test. This scale has 12 questions with time limits to assess orientation, memory, calculation, language, attention and construction. Magnitude and severity of cognitive decrement were analysed along with the possible factors affecting it.Results: Mean age of the study population was 54.6�24 years. Cognitive impairment was noted among 62 of cases and 48 of the control group, which means a 14% higher prevalence of cognitive impairment among the type 2 diabetics. The association of development of cognitive impairment and duration of diabetes mellitus was significant statistically (p value = 0.025443; p<0.05). Other demographic variables like gender, education and domicile were also seen to affect the results.Conclusions: Mild to moderate cognitive impairment was found significantly higher among the type-II diabetics than the non-diabetics. The cognitive impairment was found to be associated with the duration of diabetes. Hence the routine screening of cognition by SMMSE should be done in all type-II diabetic patients.