ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the correlation of quantitative real?time polymerase chain reaction (qRT?PCR) to the clinical characteristics of patients with viral retinitis.Methods: Retrospective case series. Results: Aqueous or vitreous samples of 20 out of 35 eyes showed qRT?PCR positivity for virus etiology (57.14%). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) was most commonly identified in nine eyes (45%). The mean DNA copy number was 2,68,339.65 copies/mL (range: 90–3205397). DNA copy number significantly correlated with the extent of clinical involvement (P = 0.013); however, there was no correlation between DNA copy number and presenting visual acuity (P = 0.31), macular involvement (P = 0.675), optic nerve involvement (P = 0.14), and development of retinal detachment (P = 0.73). There was a significant correlation between the number of DNA copies and the timing of sampling (P = 0.0005). Samples taken earlier in the course of the disease had higher viral copies than later ones. Conclusion: qRT?PCR is useful in confirming a viral etiology in over 50% of cases of suspected viral retinitis. It correlates well with the extent of clinical involvement and timing of sampling
ABSTRACT
Intraocular (IO) inflammation in patients with Human immune deficiency virus (HIV) infection can be due to opportunistic infections, immune recovery uveitis, drugs used in the management or a primary manifestation of HIV itself. We studied the role of RT-PCR for HIV RNA in confirming the diagnosis of HIV induced uveitis and its useful in the management and follow-up of these patients.
ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: Though several viruses are responsible for conjunctivitis, but human adenovirus (HAdV) is by far the most common cause. Epidemic conjunctivitis causes morbidity and early detection of aetiological agent is essential in preventing spread of disease as some of serotypes of adenoviruses cause a severe form of conjunctivitis. This study was undertaken to identify the causative agent of conjunctivitis outbreak in Chennai in 2010. Methods: Conjunctival samples collected from 17 patients with conjunctivitis were subjected to virological investigations. Culture and PCR for detection of adenovirus and enterovirus were carried out. PCR positive products were further subjected for DNA sequencing. The nucleotide sequences of the hexons of isolates were analyzed by comparison with all 51 human adenovirus strains. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using DAMBE software. Results: Among 17 patients, seven were positive for adenovirus by PCR on the direct specimen, none was positive for enterovirus. Eleven of 30 conjunctival swabs showed cytopathic effect in HEp-2 cell line and were confirmed as HAdV by PCR. The DNA sequence data of the 11 isolates had equal percentage of homology with HAdV 6 and 2 on blast analysis. On phylogenetic analysis with GeneBank data of 51 adenovirus strains, 11 isolates from patients during the outbreak of conjunctivitis formed a separate clade indicating a new variant strain. Interpretation & conclusions: Based on phylogenetic analysis it was concluded that the recent conjunctivitis outbreak that occurred in Chennai was caused by a variant adenovirus strain.