Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 588-594, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-312219

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>Breast cancer is the leading cancer among women in Singapore. Five years after a population-wide breast cancer screening programme was introduced, screening rates remained relatively low at 41%. Studies have shown decreased screening propensity among medically underserved women typically of minority or socioeconomically disadvantaged status. We conducted a quasi-randomised pragmatic trial aimed at encouraging mammography screening among underscreened or unscreened women in a publicly funded primary care facility in Singapore.</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>The study was conducted from May to August 2010. Components of intervention included (1) tailored education, (2) doctor's reminder, and (3) cost reduction. Researchers administered a structured questionnaire to eligible female polyclinic attendees and patient companions aged 40 to 69 years. Individual knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and barriers towards mammography screening were identified and educational messages tailored. Doctor's reminder and cost reduction were implemented additively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Overall, out of 448 participants, 87 (19.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.8% to 23.1%) completed mammography screening across 3 arms of study. Participants who received a cost reduction were more likely to attend screening compared to participants in other intervention arms (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.5, P = 0.009). Cost of screening, ethnicity, prior screening history, and attitudes towards mammography screening were identified as significant factors predicting mammogram attendance.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Including a cost reduction component was the most effective intervention that increased mammography screening rates. Women's underlying beliefs, attitudes, and other predisposing factors should also be considered for integration into existing breast cancer screening programmes.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms , Diagnostic Imaging , Economics , Community Health Services , Costs and Cost Analysis , Early Detection of Cancer , Economics , Health Services Accessibility , Mammography , Economics , Patient Education as Topic , Pilot Projects , Primary Health Care , Reminder Systems , Singapore
2.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore ; : 686-686, 2010.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-234068

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>We assessed the pedagogical value of a student-led community-based experiential learning project called the Public Health Screening (PHS) run by medical and nursing students of the National University of Singapore's Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (NUS YLLSoM).</p><p><b>MATERIALS AND METHODS</b>We conducted a cross-sectional study using a self-administered anonymised questionnaire on medical and nursing students who participated in PHS using the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) Survey Instrument. Participants also gave an overall score for their learning experience at the PHS.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The participation rate was 93.1% (576/619) for medical students and 100% (37/37) for nursing students. All participants gave the PHS learning experience a high rating (median = 8 out of maximum of 10, inter-quartile range, 7 to 9). A majority of participants felt that PHS had helped them to improve across all domains surveyed. For medical students, those in preclinical years and females were independently more likely to feel that PHS had helped them to improve in communication skills, teamwork, ability to identify social issues, taking action, and gaining and applying their knowledge than those in clinical years and males. Improved ability to interact with patients (β=1.64, 95%CI, 1.01-2.27), appreciation of challenges to healthcare faced by Singaporeans from lower income groups (β=0.93, 95%CI, 0.49-1.37), thinking of others (β=0.70, 95%CI, 0.04-1.37) and tolerance of different people (β =0.63, 95%CI, 0.17-1.10) were strongly associated with the overall rating score.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>PHS was a positive learning experience in a wide range of domains for all students involved. This suggests that student-organised community-based experiential learning projects have potential educational value for both medical and nursing students.</p>


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Attitude of Health Personnel , Community Health Services , Confidence Intervals , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Education, Medical , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Learning , Logistic Models , Mass Screening , Models, Educational , Odds Ratio , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Public Health Practice , Schools, Medical , Singapore , Students, Medical , Students, Nursing , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching , Volunteers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL