Temporal Bone CT Findings of Tuberculous Otitis Media: Comparison with Chronic Otitis Media

PURPOSE: To compare the differential findings of tuberculous otitis media(TOM) with those of chronic suppurative otitis media with or without cholesteatoma, as seen on high resolution temporal bone CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 14 cases of TOM, 30 cases of chronic suppurative otitis media(CSOM), and 30cases of chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma(Chole). All had been pathologically confirmed. We evaluated thepreservation of mastoid cells without sclerotic change, the location and extension of soft tissue to the externalauditary canal, the erosion of ossicles, the tegmen tympani, scutum, bony labyr inth, facial nerve canal andsigmoid sinus, and the presence of intracranial co mplications. RESULTS: Soft tissue in the mastoid antrum wasseen in all cases of TOM(100%), 29 cases of CSOM(96.7%), and 26 cases of Chole(86.7%). In contrast, the softtissue in the entire middle ear cavity was noted in 13 cases of TOM(92.8%), 7 cases of CSOM(23.3%), and 12 casesof Chole(40%). Soft tissue extended to the superior aspect of the external auditory canal in 4 cases of TOM(28.6%) and 5 cases of Chole (16.7%). Mastoid air cells were seen in 9 cases of TOM (64.3%), 4 cases of CSOM(13.3%), and 3 cases of Chole(10%). Ossicular erosion was noted in 6 cases of TOM (42.9%), 12 cases of CSOM (40%),and 26 cases of Chole(86.7%), while in one case of TOM (7.1%), 5 cases of CSOM (16.7%), and 15 cases of Chole(50%)there was erosion of the scutum. In one case of TOM, follow-up CT study after 9 months of antituberculousmedication without surgery revealed complete clearing of previously noted soft tissue in the middle ear cavity. CONCLUSION: Specific CT findings of TOM were not seen, but if there were findings of soft tissue in the entiremiddle ear cavity, soft tissue extension to the external auditory canal, preservation of mastoid air cells withoutsclerotic change, and intact scutum, TOM may be differentiated from other chronic otitis media.

Value of Noncontrast Spiral CT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy and clinical efficacy of noncontrast spiral CT in patients withsuspected acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a six-month period, 100 patients with suspected acuteappendicitis were prospectively evaluated with noncontrast spiral CT. All scans were obtained from the lower bodyof L3 to the symphysis pubis, with 5mm or 10mm collimation and pitich of 1 or 1.5, and without intravenous or oralcontrast material. Diagnosis was established by means of surgical or clinical follow-up. Prospective diagnosisbased on CT findings was compared with surgical results and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Acute appendicitis wasconfirmed in 47 of 100 patients. On the basis of the basis of the CT findings, SI patients were prospectivelyinterpreted as positive for appendicitis, but in six the diagnosis was false-positive. Two of the 47 with acuteappendicitis were prospectively interpreted as normal. The preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis was, thus,45 true-positive, 47 true-negative, six falsepositive and two false-negative, yielding a sensitivity of 96%, aspecificity of 89%, an accurace of 92%, a positive predictive value of 88%, and a negative predictive value of96%. Using CT, an alternative diagnosis was established in 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Noncontrast spiral CT is auseful technique for diagnosing acute appendicitis.