Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association ; : 61-67, 2021.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-919984

ABSTRACT

Purpose@#To evaluate the prognostic factors affecting poor functional outcomes in patients with retear after rotator cuff repair. @*Materials and Methods@#From January 2013 to December 2018, among 631 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of a rotator cuff tear, 42 patients, who could be followed-up for more than one year and showed a retear of the repaired cuff on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were collected retrospectively. The preoperative demographic data, range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, fatty degeneration, and tear progression on postoperative MRI, as well as other factors that could affect the clinical outcomes, were analyzed. Patients who scored <80 points on the ASES score were allocated to the poor function group. The risk factors for poor clinical outcomes were compared with the group with ASES scores of 80 or above. @*Results@#The postoperative functional results in the group with retear (n=42) after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed significant improvement. Univariate analysis revealed the preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score and tear progression to have associations with a poor shoulder function. In addition, subscapularis repair was found to be associated with a good shoulder function. The preoperative VAS score and tear progression except for subscapularis repair were independent factors associated with poor clinical outcomes according to multivariate logistic regression analysis. @*Conclusion@#In patients with retear after rotator cuff repair, the preoperative VAS and tear progression in postoperative MRI are factors predicting a poor functional outcome.

2.
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery ; : 89-95, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-892546

ABSTRACT

Objectives@#To compare and analyze the rate and risk factors of implant failure according to the use of solid pedicle screws or cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws in lumbar fusion surgery.Summary of Literature Review: In previous studies, the use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws was found to improve the pull-out strength and to reduce the risk of implant failure in patients with osteoporosis. However, the clinical risk factors for implant failure have not been established. @*Materials and Methods@#From January 2016 to December 2018, 177 patients with spine fracture and degenerative thoracolumbar disease were included in a retrospective study, and the patients underwent spinal fusion surgery using pedicle screws. Solid pedicle screws were used in 118 patients and cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws were used in 59 patients. During the follow-up period, simple radiography and computed tomography were performed to evaluate cases of implant failure, including pedicle screw loosening, migration, and pull-out, and to analyze risk factors for implant failure. @*Results@#Implant failures were observed in 21 patients (11.9%, 21/177) during the follow-up period. Of the 21 patients with implant failure, 18 were in the solid pedicle screw group (15.3%, 18/118), and 3 patients were in the cement augmented cannulated pedicle screw group (5.1%, 3/59). The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Age over 65 years, osteoporosis, autoimmune disease (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.), chronic kidney disease, and steroid use (<0.05) were statistically significantly more common in patients who experienced implant failure. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, age over 65 (odds ratio, 4.47;p=0.032), osteoporosis (odds ratio, 3.68; p=0.017), autoimmune disease (odds ratio, 3.59; p=0.039), and chronic kidney disease (odds ratio, 4.67; p=0.043) were statistically significant risk factors for implant failure. @*Conclusions@#Patients underwent thoracolumbar fusion who were over 65 years of age, had osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, or autoimmune disease showed a high implant failure rate. The use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws might be an effective method to significantly decrease the likelihood of implant failure in patients with these risk factors.

3.
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery ; : 89-95, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-900250

ABSTRACT

Objectives@#To compare and analyze the rate and risk factors of implant failure according to the use of solid pedicle screws or cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws in lumbar fusion surgery.Summary of Literature Review: In previous studies, the use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws was found to improve the pull-out strength and to reduce the risk of implant failure in patients with osteoporosis. However, the clinical risk factors for implant failure have not been established. @*Materials and Methods@#From January 2016 to December 2018, 177 patients with spine fracture and degenerative thoracolumbar disease were included in a retrospective study, and the patients underwent spinal fusion surgery using pedicle screws. Solid pedicle screws were used in 118 patients and cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws were used in 59 patients. During the follow-up period, simple radiography and computed tomography were performed to evaluate cases of implant failure, including pedicle screw loosening, migration, and pull-out, and to analyze risk factors for implant failure. @*Results@#Implant failures were observed in 21 patients (11.9%, 21/177) during the follow-up period. Of the 21 patients with implant failure, 18 were in the solid pedicle screw group (15.3%, 18/118), and 3 patients were in the cement augmented cannulated pedicle screw group (5.1%, 3/59). The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). Age over 65 years, osteoporosis, autoimmune disease (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.), chronic kidney disease, and steroid use (<0.05) were statistically significantly more common in patients who experienced implant failure. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, age over 65 (odds ratio, 4.47;p=0.032), osteoporosis (odds ratio, 3.68; p=0.017), autoimmune disease (odds ratio, 3.59; p=0.039), and chronic kidney disease (odds ratio, 4.67; p=0.043) were statistically significant risk factors for implant failure. @*Conclusions@#Patients underwent thoracolumbar fusion who were over 65 years of age, had osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, or autoimmune disease showed a high implant failure rate. The use of cement augmented cannulated pedicle screws might be an effective method to significantly decrease the likelihood of implant failure in patients with these risk factors.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL