Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Acta gastroenterol. latinoam ; 43(3): 189-97, 2013 Sep.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1157387

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of routine gastric biopsies taken at random versus targeted biopsies with methylene blue staining for the diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a validation study in 376 patients. We performed 2 antral biopsies, 2 gastric body biopsies, 1 biopsy for urease test and additional biopsies if demanded. One hundred and one patients underwent 2 biopsies after methylene blue staining. A total of 1,486 biopsies were analyzed. Frequencies of histological and endoscopic diagnosis and the validation of endoscopic diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia with and without staining against histology, which followed updated Sydney and Vienna criteria, were determined RESULTS: Metaplasia was found in 37.23


ofcases and in 6.38


was incomplete in antrum and body, moderate or severe. The endoscopic diagnosis had: sensitivity 46


. The low sensitivity indicates the need for gastric biopsies. Staining had: sensitivity 95


, with significant difference for staining (P < 0.05). The typical endoscopic appearance of intestinal metaplasia always coincided with staining and histology. Dysplasia was found in 0.53


ofcases, gastric cancer in 1.8


and Helicobacter pylori in 56


. CONCLUSION: Directed biopsy staining is superior to those taken at random for diagnosing metaplasia. Metaplasia was not found when endoscopy was normal and typical endoscopic appearance of metaplasia agreed with staining and histology.


Subject(s)
Methylene Blue/diagnosis , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Biopsy/methods , Staining and Labeling/methods , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Prospective Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Metaplasia/pathology , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Predictive Value of Tests , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL