Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol ; 2004 Oct; 48(4): 466-70
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-108790

ABSTRACT

In this study, the ocular surface anaesthetic and analgesic efficacies of 0.5% and 1% centbucridine both in saline were compared with 4% lignocaine drops in distilled water in normal healthy volunteers divided into three equal groups. In 99 healthy eyes, keeping one eye as an unanaesthetized control, one drop of any of the above three coded drugs was instilled in the contralateral eye, followed by one more drop of the same drug in the same eye after 3 minutes. The oneset of anaesthesia, achievement and duration of peak activity, total duration of action, the depth of analgesia, and period of burning sensation were all noted in this double-masked randomized controlled trial with the various drug solutions. Total peak duration of anaesthetic as well as analgesic effects in the 99 healthy normal eyes were found to be the highest with centbucridine 1%, followed by 4% lignocaine and 0.5% centbucridine respectively.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Lidocaine/pharmacology , Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures , Prospective Studies , Tacrine/analogs & derivatives
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL