Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Chinese Journal of Surgery ; (12): 498-501, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-245841

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the results of surgical treatment for primary liver cancer of segment VII or VIII.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The clinical data of 149 patients with primary liver cancer who underwent hepatectomy between January 2005 and December 2010 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 120 male and 29 female patients, aging from 19 to 75 years with a mean of 53.1 years. Among 149 patients, tumors were located at segment VII, VIII or several segments containing VII or VIII (VII/VIII group) in 53 patients, located at other segments (non-VII/VIII group) in 96 patients. The results of surgical treatment for VII/VIII group and non-VII/VIII group were compared by using t test, χ(2) test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportion hazard regression analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Right liver lobe was turned over completely in VII/VIII group, hepatic lobe which tumor was located at was not or partly turned over in non-VII/VIII group. Compared with non-VII/VIII group, VII/VIII group had longer operative time ((215 ± 68) min vs. (123 ± 36) min, t = 2.860, P = 0.01). No significant difference was found for tumor size, tumor number, tumor encapsulation, microvascular invasion, Edmondson grade, pTNM stage, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, R0 resection rate and postoperative complication rate between two groups. The cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 74.6%, 42.3%, 15.4% respectively, in VII/VIII group, and 89.3%, 63.0%, 40.4% respectively, in non-VII/VIII group (χ(2) = 13.501, P = 0.000). Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors indicated that tumor location (tumor was located at segment VII or VIII) had unfavorable prognostic influence on overall survival (χ(2) = 10.329, P = 0.001; HR = 1.693, 95%CI: 1.232 - 2.694, P = 0.013).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The results of surgical treatment for primary liver cancer located at segment VII or VIII are worse than that located at other segments.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms , Diagnosis , General Surgery , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Chinese Journal of Hepatology ; (12): 900-904, 2010.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-360801

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate effects of celecoxib (a selective cox-2 inhibitor)combined with fluvastatin (a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor) on tumor growth and cell apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma xenograft in nude mice.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into the left armpit of nude mice, the mice (n = 32) were then randomly divided into 4 groups: the control group, the celecoxib group,the fluvastatin group and the combination group. At the end of the study, Tumor Tissues were collected for analysis. Cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry analysis and TUNEL assay. Akt, p-Akt and survivin protein levels were measured by Western blot. Statistical comparisons were made using factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparisons between each two groups were calculated using SNK-q test.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The combination of Celecoxib and fluvastatin resulted in a greater inhibition of tumor growth than either agent alone, the tumor inhibitory rate was 34.0% in the Celecoxib group, 25.0% in the fluvastatin group and 72.2% in the combination group. The percentages of TUNEL--positive cancer cells in the celecoxib and fluvastatin alone treatment groups were 8.5%+/-1.4% and 9.4%+/-1.7% respectively as compared to the control group which was 3.5%+/-0.8%. Combination therapy showed a significantly greater increase in tumor cell apoptosis in comparison with the control and single-therapy groups (apoptotic index: 19.4%+/-3.0%; P value is less than 0.01 versus celecoxib or fluvastatin groups). The results of flow cytometry analysis also showed the same tendency. a small number of apoptotic cells were detected in the control tumours (4.1%+/-1.6%), whereas a large number of apoptotic cells were detected in tumours treated with celecoxib (9.1%+/-2.1%) or fluvastatin (10.1%+/-2.3%) alone; and the combination therapy resulted in even more apoptotic cells (23.6%+/-5.8%; P value is less than 0.01 versus celecoxib or fluvastatin groups). Western blot analysis demonstrated that the combination of celecoxib and fluvastatin significantly down-regulated p-Akt (0.23+/-0.08 versus 1.12+/-0.07 and surviving (0.50+/-0.07 versus 1.47+/-0.19) in BEL-7402 tumours compared with the control (P value is less than 0.01 for all).</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The present study provided evidence that treatment with celecoxib in combination with fluvastatin resulted in the inhibition of HCC tumour growth in an in vivo mouse model.</p>


Subject(s)
Animals , Mice , Apoptosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Drug Therapy , Metabolism , Pathology , Celecoxib , Cell Line, Tumor , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors , Pharmacology , Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated , Pharmacology , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Pharmacology , Indoles , Pharmacology , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Nude , Pyrazoles , Pharmacology , Sulfonamides , Pharmacology , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL