ABSTRACT
The study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for 28-day mortality in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Patients receiving ECMO treatment were selected from the Department of Intensive Care Medicine of Zhejiang Hospital from January 2019 to February 2022. The moment when patients started receiving ECMO treatment was set as the starting point, and death at 28 days was set as the endpoint. The patients were divided into survivors and deaths. Laboratory tests, such as neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts, using the peripheral blood of all patients were collected within 24 h after ECMO treatment. NLR and PLR were calculated. The risk factors influencing prognosis were analyzed by logistic regression. The correlation between NLR, PLR, acute physiology, and chronic health score Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) was investigated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to analyze the value of NLR and PLR in predicting the 28-day mortality of patients treated with ECMO. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the cumulative survival of patients at 28 days. The results showed that of 53 patients, 20 survived, and 33 died. The NLR and PLR of the deceased were higher than those of the survivors (NLR: 30.67±14.48 vs. 17.41±7.06;PLR: 303.34±159.23 vs. 191.54±106.03; P<0.001). NLR and PLR were positively correlated with APACHE Ⅱ ( r=0.296, r=0.284, P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of NLR and PLR to predict the 28 d death of ECMO-treated patients was 0.805 and 0.714, respectively, and the optimal cutoff values of NLR and PLR were 18.93 and 253.0, respectively. The 28-day fatality rate in patients with NLR≥18.93 was higher than that in patients with NLR<18.93 [86.20%(25/29) vs. 33.33%(8/24), χ2=15.625, P<0.01],that in patients with a PLR≥253.0 was higher than that in patients with PLR<253.0 [82.61%(19/23) vs. 46.67%(14/30), χ2=7.158, P<0.01]. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the 28-day cumulative survival rate of NLR≥18.93 was lower than that of NLR<18.93 [9.00 (2.00, 19.50) d vs. 28.00 (10.75, 28.00) d, Z=-3.124, P<0.01], and that of PLR≥253.0 was lower than that of PLR<253.0 [6.00 (2.00, 19.00) d vs. 28.00 (6.25, 28.00) d, Z=-2.673, P<0.01]. Thus, NLR and PLR have good predictive value for 28-day mortality in patients treated with ECMO.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the application of heparin-binding protein (HBP) in diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients.@*Methods@#An extensive search for the Chinese and English literatures from the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data, CNKI and VIP up to July 2019 was performed. The articles regarding HBP for the diagnosing of sepsis in adult patients were enrolled. Two researchers independently extracted related literature. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 12.0 were used for Meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HBP for sepsis. Deek funnel plot was used to detect publication bias.@*Results@#A total of 10 studies with 1 884 patients were included in this Meta-analysis. The quality of the literature was relatively moderate. HBP in plasma were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in all studies. The studies showed substantial heterogeneity, and random effect model was used for Meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.77-0.83], 0.80 (95%CI was 0.78-0.82), 3.96 (95%CI was 2.45-6.41), 0.28 (95%CI was 0.20-0.39) and 14.63 (95%CI was 6.83-31.30) respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.86 and the Cochran-Q was 0.79. To explore the potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed based on the severity of the disease, diagnostic criteria and region. However, the results indicated that no methodological covariates affected the diagnostic accuracy of HBP, indicating that there was still unexplained heterogeneity. In addition, the sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies were performed. No outlier study was identified and the results were relatively stable and reliable. Deek funnel plot showed little publication bias.@*Conclusions@#There is preferable value of HBP for diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients. However, it needs to be further confirmed by large multicenter studies.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the application of heparin-binding protein (HBP) in diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients. Methods An extensive search for the Chinese and English literatures from the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data, CNKI and VIP up to July 2019 was performed. The articles regarding HBP for the diagnosing of sepsis in adult patients were enrolled. Two researchers independently extracted related literature. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 12.0 were used for Meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HBP for sepsis. Deek funnel plot was used to detect publication bias. Results A total of 10 studies with 1 884 patients were included in this Meta-analysis. The quality of the literature was relatively moderate. HBP in plasma were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in all studies. The studies showed substantial heterogeneity, and random effect model was used for Meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.77-0.83], 0.80 (95%CI was 0.78-0.82), 3.96 (95%CI was 2.45-6.41), 0.28 (95%CI was 0.20-0.39) and 14.63 (95%CI was 6.83-31.30) respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.86 and the Cochran-Q was 0.79. To explore the potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed based on the severity of the disease, diagnostic criteria and region. However, the results indicated that no methodological covariates affected the diagnostic accuracy of HBP, indicating that there was still unexplained heterogeneity. In addition, the sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies were performed. No outlier study was identified and the results were relatively stable and reliable. Deek funnel plot showed little publication bias. Conclusions There is preferable value of HBP for diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients. However, it needs to be further confirmed by large multicenter studies.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the application of heparin-binding protein (HBP) in diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients. Methods An extensive search for the Chinese and English literatures from the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang data, CNKI and VIP up to July 2019 was performed. The articles regarding HBP for the diagnosing of sepsis in adult patients were enrolled. Two researchers independently extracted related literature. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 12.0 were used for Meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HBP for sepsis. Deek funnel plot was used to detect publication bias. Results A total of 10 studies with 1 884 patients were included in this Meta-analysis. The quality of the literature was relatively moderate. HBP in plasma were detected by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in all studies. The studies showed substantial heterogeneity, and random effect model was used for Meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.80 [95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.77-0.83], 0.80 (95%CI was 0.78-0.82), 3.96 (95%CI was 2.45-6.41), 0.28 (95%CI was 0.20-0.39) and 14.63 (95%CI was 6.83-31.30) respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.86 and the Cochran-Q was 0.79. To explore the potential sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed based on the severity of the disease, diagnostic criteria and region. However, the results indicated that no methodological covariates affected the diagnostic accuracy of HBP, indicating that there was still unexplained heterogeneity. In addition, the sensitivity analysis by removing individual studies were performed. No outlier study was identified and the results were relatively stable and reliable. Deek funnel plot showed little publication bias. Conclusions There is preferable value of HBP for diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients. However, it needs to be further confirmed by large multicenter studies.
ABSTRACT
Objective To systematically evaluate the effects of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) determined by two dimensional speckle tracking imaging technology (2D-STI) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on the prognosis of patients with sepsis/septic shock.Methods Databases such as the National Library of Medicine PubMed database, Dutch medical abstracts Embase, Cochrane Library, Netherlands Elsevier, Springer and China biomedical literature database (CBMdisc), China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Wanfang database, China science and technology journal full-text database, Vip Chinese biomedical journal database were searched from the establishment of literature database to April 2018 to study GLS, LVEF and their relationships with mortality of septic/septic shock patients. The literatures screening and data collecting were independently conducted by two researchers, and the quality of the included literature was evaluated. The sensitivity and heterogeneity analysis were performed with RevMan 5.3 software, and the combined effects were calculated. Funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias.Results A total of 6 articles including 5 English articles and 1 Chinese article were enrolled. There were 503 patients, 333 in the survival group and 170 in the death group. The quality of the literature was high, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) score was 8-9. Meta-analysis showed that short-term mortality was associated with higher GLS in patients with sepsis/septic shock [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.47, 95％ confidence interval (95％CI) = -0.76 to -0.18, Z = 3.16,P = 0.002], and there was no significant difference in LVEF between the survival group and the death group (SMD = 0.18, 95％CI = -0.03-0.39,Z = 1.64, P = 0.10). Sensitivity analysis was carried out for each effect index by removing each document one by one, and the results showed that there was no significant change in the combined effect before and after each document, indicating that the results were stable. The funnel plot showed that the effect points of each literature were roughly in the form of "inverted funnels" with a large symmetric distribution centered on the combined effect, but the number of studies included in this study was too small, so the publication bias could not be completely excluded.Conclusion Compared with LVEF, GLS might be a more sensitive indicator for detecting myocardial dysfunction in patients with sepsis/septic shock and might have important predictive value for short-term mortality.