ABSTRACT
Objective To compare endoscopic stenting with surgery for pyloric obstruction caused by unresectable gastric cancer.Methods Between June 2002 and June 2012,6 patients underwent endoscopic stenting and 70 did surgery for gastric outlet obstruction caused by gastric cancer.Results There were no significant difference in technical success rate and clinical success rate between the stenting and surgery groups (P ＞ 0.05).The stenting group had shorter time to oral intake,and shorter length of hospital stay [(2.5-± 3.1) d vs.(6.6 ± 3.5) d,t =-7.0,P ＜ 0.001].The incidence of early complications was significantly higher in the surgery group.However,the rates of late complications were significantly lower in the surgery group.Moreover,the surgery group was significantly associated with a longer patency duration [(295.8 d,95％ CI:260.7-330.8) vs.(168.2 d,95％ CI:134.7-201.7 d),P ＜0.001] and overall survival [(307.6 d,95％ CI:272.4-342.8 d) vs.(229.6 d,95％ CI:195.1-264.3 d),P =0.003].Conclusions Both endoscopic stenting and surgery are effective palliative therapy for gastric outlet obstruction caused by gastric cancer.Endoscopic stenting is associated with better shortterm outcomes.Surgery is preferable to ES in longer patency duration.