ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the difference between breast bracket combined with polyurethane foam and single polyurethane foam in the accuracy of immobilization, providing a better immobilization for breast cancer radiotherapy.Methods:Fifty breast cancer patients who received radiotherapy in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from March 2021 to July 2021 were selected. Among them, 25 patients were immobilized with polyurethane foam (foam group), and the other 25 patients were immobilized with polyurethane foam combined with breast bracket (combination group). All patients were scanned by CBCT once a week to obtain setup errors in the SI, LR and AP directions for t-test. The formula M PTV=2.5 Σ+0.7 σ was used to calculate the margin of the planning target volume(M PTV). Results:The setup errors in the foam group were SI (2.0±3.26) mm, LR (0.88±2.76) mm, AP (1.22±3.55) mm, Rtn -0.24°±0.85°, Pitch 0.16°±1.11°, Roll -0.32°±1.05°, and the M PTV were 6.75 mm, 8.46 mm and 8.73 mm, respectively. The setup errors in the combination group were SI (1.0±3.01) mm, LR (0.62±2.74) mm, AP (1.82±3.21) mm, Rtn 0.64°±0.59°, Pitch 0.71°±1.22°, Roll 0.29°±0.73°, and the M PTV were 6.35 mm, 7.47 mm, and 7.61 mm, respectively. After comparing the setup errors in the three-dimensional directions between two groups, the t value of LR, SI, AP and Rtn, Pitch, Roll was -4.304, -2.681, 1.384, and -9.457, -3.683, -5.323, respectively. And the differences in the LR, SI, Rtn, Pitch and Roll directions were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions:The immobilization effect of polyurethane foam combined with breast bracket is better and the M PTV is also smaller than those of polyurethane foam alone. Therefore, it is recommended to use polyurethane foam combined with breast bracket for immobilization in breast cancer radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) combined with stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients with bone metastasis.Methods:The clinical data of 80 RCC patients with bone metastasis in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from April 2010 to April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, 64 patients were medium or high risk according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium(IMDC) score. Twenty-four patients received TKI therapy alone(Group A), and the other 56 cases received TKIs combined with SBRT to bone metastastic lesions (Group B).Results:The median follow-up period was 20.7 months (4.8-115.6 months), 70 patients received second or third-line targeted drug therapy, and 4 patients in group A and 15 patients in group B received TKI plus immunotherapy. Fifty-four patients had symptoms of bone pain before radiotherapy, 46 patients were satisfied with the analgesic effect after SBRT treatment. Twelve patients got complete response (CR) after bone lesions, and 32 patients achieved partial response (PR). Forty patients died of disease progression during follow-up. The median OS was: 20.7 months vs not reached(Group A vs. Group B), and the 2-y OS and 5-y OS were 50% vs. 62%, and 19% vs. 56%, respectively ( P=0.006). There were only 2 patients (3.6%) had grade 3 SBRT related adverse events. Conclusions:SBRT combined with TKIs improved the quality of life and prolonged the overall survival of RCC patients with bone metastasis.