Research progress on artificial meniscus implants / 生物医学工程学杂志

Meniscus injury has been one of the most common knee injuries in current society. The research on artificial meniscus implants as substitutes in meniscus reconstruction therapy has become global focus in order to solve clinical problems such as irreparable meniscus injury and symptoms after full or partial meniscectomy. At present, researches on artificial meniscus implants mainly focus on biodegradable meniscus scaffolds and non-biodegradable meniscus substitutes. Although the commercialized meniscal implants, such as CMI , Actifit and NUsurface , have been applied in the clinical, none of them can perfectively restore or permanently replace the natural meniscus tissue, effectively solve the symptoms after meniscectomy, and prevent cartilage degenerative diseases. The research progress, application, advantages and disadvantages of different kinds of artificial meniscus implants are reviewed in this manuscript, and the prospect is provided.

Three dimensional reconstruction and measurement of the proximal femur in adult developmental dysplasia of the hip / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate characteristics and the differences of the anatomical parameters of the proximal femur of the developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 38 patients(47 hips) diagnosed as DDH with CT scan data and the pelvis radiograph from January 2012 to December 2014 in China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University were retrospectively analyzed. All the hips were divided into 3 groups according to Crowe classification method. Thirty normal hips were selected as controls who admitted at the same time. CT data of the patients were imported into Mimics 17.0. The three-dimensional models of the proximal femur were then reconstructed, and the following parameters were measured: neck-shaft angle, neck length, offset, height of the centre of femoral head, height of the isthmus, height of greater trochanter, the medullary canal diameter of isthmus (Di), the medullary canal diameter 10 mm above the apex of the lesser trochanter (DT+ 10), the medullary canal diameter 20 mm below the apex of the lesser trochanter (DT-20), and then DT+ 10/Di, DT-20/Di and DT+ 10/DT-20 were calculated.Variance discrepancy analysis was used to compare the difference among the four groups, and LSD method was used to compare the difference between either two groups.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The parameters of neck-shaft angle of DDH with Crowe I, Crowe II-III, Crowe IV and the control group were (131.8°±7.1°), (131.7°±6.5°), (122.8°±11.4°) and (131.8°±5.9°), respectively; the parameters of neck-shaft angle of DDH with Crowe IV was smaller than that of DDH with Crowe I, Crowe II-III and control group (all P<0.05). The parameters of the neck length of DDH with Crowe IV ((44.6±6.6) mm) was smaller than that of DDH with Crowe I ((48.6±6.7) mm), Crowe II-III ((50.4±4.7) mm) (all P<0.05). There is no statistic difference in the offset among the groups (F=2.392, P>0.05). The parameters of the height of greater trochanter of DDH with Crowe IV ((12.1±6.1) mm) was bigger than that of DDH with Crowe I ((8.9±7.2) mm), Crowe II-III ((7.5±3.3) mm) and control group ((6.1±3.9) mm) (all P<0.05). The parameters of the height of the centre of femoral head of DDH with Crowe I, Crowe II-III, Crowe IV were (39.6±6.5) mm, (39.1±4.2) mm, (38.8±8.6) mm, which were smaller than that of the control group ((46.5±6.2) mm) (all P<0.05). The parameters of Di of DDH with Crowe I, Crowe II-III, Crowe IV and the control group were (9.9±2.2) mm, (8.3±1.8) mm, (8.7±1.7) mm and (10.1±1.4) mm; the parameters of Di of DDH with Crowe II-III and Crowe IV were smaller than that of the control group (all P<0.05). The parameters of DT+ 10 ((17.2±5.3) mm) and DT-20 ((12.2±3.0) mm) of DDH with Crowe IV were smaller than that of DDH with Crowe I ((25.2±3.4) mm, (17.1±2.3) mm) and Crowe II-III ((21.9±4.2) mm, (16.3±3.2) mm) (all P<0.05). The parameter of the height of the isthmus of DDH with Crowe IV ((94.1±19.7) mm) was smaller than that of DDH with Crowe I ((106.2±13.8) mm), Crowe II-III ((108.8±10.5) mm) and control group ((116.5±10.6) mm), respectively (P=0.010, 0.008, 0.000). The parameters of DT+ 10/Di (2.0±0.4) and DT-20/Di (1.4±0.2) of DDH with Crowe IV were smaller than that of DDH with Crowe I (2.6±0.5, 1.8±0.3), Crowe II-III (2.7±0.60, 1.9±0.3) (all P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Comparing to DDH with Crowe I-III and control group, DDH with Crowe IV has a dramatic change in the intramedullary and extramedullary parameters. The isthmus and the great trochanter are higher and there is apparent narrowing of the medullary canal around the level of the lesser trochanter.</p>

Influence of pelvic obliquity in lateral position to acetabular component orientation during total hip arthroplasty / 中华骨科杂志

Objective To explore the influence of pelvis obliquity in lateral position to acetabular component orientation during total hip arthroplasty (THA),and the method to correct.Methods Fifty patients (62 hips) were performed THA with posterolateral incision in lateral position by the same team.The patients were randomized and divided into experimental group (EX,with 25 cases,34 hips) and control group (CON,with 25 cases,28 hips).In EX group,the acetabular components were placed by means of the gradienter and plumb correcting technique during THA.While in CON group,the acetabular components were placed by traditional method during THA.The acetabular abduction angles were measured postoperatively,and compared between the two groups.Results The average obliquity of pelvis was-1.647°±4.512°in EX group when putting the patient in lateral position before correcting.Through the application of gradienter and plumb,the average abduction angle of acetabular component was 42.685°±3.355° postoperatively,with the difference of 1.962°±1.515° compared with the preoperative angles.And in CON group,the average abduction angle of acetabular component was 44.534°±4.844° postoperatively,with the difference of 4.244°±3.042°.The difference of abduction angle in CON group was much higher than that in EX group (P＜0.05).Conclusion The pelvic obliquity when putting the patient under lateral position will affect the surgeons'judgments of placing acetabular component during THA,furthermore,lead to inconsistency among the abduction angles obtained preoperatively,intraoperatively and postoperatively.By applying the correcting method with gradienter and plumb,the discrepancy can reduce obviously between the abduction angle measured postoperatively and that of measured during operation comparing with traditional method.