Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic valve disease: clinical analysis of 101 consecutive patients / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To review the results for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) through a 5 cm right anterolateral thoracotomy.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From July 2009 to September 2011, 101 consecutive patients with isolated aortic valve disease (degenerative in 37 patients, rheumatic in 21 patients, congenital in 37 patients, endocarditic in 3 patients and aorta-arteritis in 1 patients) underwent AVR through the right anterolateral thoracotomy approach in the third intercostal space with a groin incision for femoral connection of cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean age was 45.7 years (ranging from 17 to 71 years). Sixty patients were male.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Operations were successfully performed in all but 1 patient (1.0%) who required intraoperative conversion to full sternotomy. Mean duration of cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time was (88 ± 24) minutes and (55 ± 18) minutes, respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 1.0% (1/101), this patient was found difficult in weaning off cardiopulmonary bypass and exhibited severe coronary artery plaque, although bypass graft was carried out immediately, the patient died of severe low cardiac output syndrome finally. No blood products were needed in 83.2% patients. Follow-up was performed in all patients at an average of (16 ± 7) months postoperatively. A good recovery was obtained in all patients except one who died of multiple organ failure caused by massive cerebral infarction 38 days after surgery.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement though the right anterolateral thoracotomy approach is safe and feasible, with good cosmetic results and rapid postoperative recovery. It is worthy of clinical elective application.</p>

Repair of posterior mitral valve prolapsed: comparative study of three different approaches / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compared outcomes of robotic mitral valve repair with those of standard sternotomy, and right anterolateral thoracotomy.</p><p><b>METHOD</b>From August 2010 to July 2011, 70 patients with degenerative mitral valve disease and posterior leaflet prolapsed scheduled for elective isolated mitral valve repair were prospectively nonrandomized to undergo mitral valve operation by standard sternotomy (n = 30), right anterolateral thoracotomy (n = 30), or a robotic approach (n = 10). There were 49 male and 21 female patients, aging from 16 to 70 years with a mean of 53.4 years. Outcomes of the three groups were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Mitral valve repair was achieved in all patients except 1 patient in the standard group. There were no in-hospital deaths. The median operation time [(300 ± 41) min, (184 ± 20) min and (169 ± 22) min, F = 112.5, P < 0.01], cardiopulmonary bypass time [(139 ± 26) min, (82 ± 20) min and (69 ± 23) min, F = 36.8, P < 0.01], aortic cross-clamping time [(93 ± 23) min, (47 ± 10) min and (38 ± 8) min, F = 75.0, P < 0.01] were longer for robotic than standard sternotomy and right anterolateral thoracotomy. The robotic group had shortest time of mechanical ventilation time [(4.9 ± 2.1) h, (5.3 ± 4.5) h and (14.1 ± 10.2) h, F = 13.2, P < 0.01], ICU time [(15.1 ± 2.1) h, (16.4 ± 5.4) h and (28.7 ± 16.1) h, F = 11.6, P < 0.01], postoperative hospital stay time [(4.6 ± 1.0) d, (5.7 ± 1.7) d and (8.8 ± 5.1) d, F = 8.0, P < 0.01] with the lowest of drainage [(192 ± 200) ml, (215 ± 163) ml and (405 ± 239) ml, F = 7.1, P < 0.01] and ratio of the patients needed blood transfusion (0, 20.0% and 66.7%, χ(2) = 22.7, P < 0.01). Patients were followed up 6 to 17 months, with 100% completed. No patients died during follow-ups, and no moderate or more mitral regurgitation was observed. The robotic group had the shortest time of return to normal activities compared with the other two groups [(2.4 ± 0.7) weeks, (4.2 ± 1.2) weeks and (8.2 ± 1.8) weeks, F = 83.0, P < 0.01].</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>This study shows mitral valve repair via the right anterolateral thoracotomy and a robotic approach is safe and feasible, with good cosmetic results and rapid postoperative recovery, and is worthy of clinical selective application.</p>