ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the feasibility and the reliability of emergency temporary cardiac pacing under fluoroscopy and nofluoroscopy,and compare to the superiority and inferiority between two groups.Methods Fifty-seven patients were temporarily paced under fluoroscopy and nofluoroscopy by the way which the common bi-pole temporary endocardium pacing electrode was introduced into the right ventricle by the bi-subclavian vein and right internal jugular.Result Twenty-six patients were successfully paced under fluoroscopy,and 27 patients of 31 were successfully paced without fluoroscopy,the other 4 patients were not paced successfully.Besides,there was no any complication in all patients.Conclusion Emergency temporary cardiac pacing without fluoroscopy is utility,saving time and safety,Compared to other method,the effect is proximity and even superior than the way under fluoroscopy.The way of the emergency temporary cardiac pacing without fluoroscopy is applied widespreadly in the work of clinical first aid.