ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) in the pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant obstructive jaundice.Methods Database including PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,Academic Degree Dissertation Database and Conference Database were searched with malignant obstructive jaundice,pancreaticoduodenectomy,preoperative biliary drainage,comparative study.Literatures about the randomized controlled trials of PBD (PBD group) and efficacy of early surgery (ES group) in the pancreaticoduodenectomy were retrieved from January 2001 to December 2013,and then a Meta analysis was carried out based on the data.The count data were analyzed using the odds ratio (OR),relative risk (RR) and 95％ confidence interval (95％ CI),and the measurement data were analyzed using mean difference (MD) and 95％ CI.The heterogeneity of the data was analyzed using the I2 test.Data were integrated by fixed or random effect model.Results Twelve literatures including 1 982 patients were selected.There were 1 029 patients in the PBD group and 953 in the ES group.The results of Meta analysis showed that the operation time,volume of blood loss and rate of postoperative wound infection in the PBD group were significantly different from those in the ES group (MD =10.50,107.92,95％ CI:6.34-14.66,16.43-199.42;RR =1.62,95％CI:1.19-2.21,P ＜0.05).There were no significant differences in the postoperative mortality,incidence of pancreatic fistula,incidence of bile leakage,incidence of delayed gastric emptying and duration of hospital stay between the 2 groups (RR=0.69,95％CI:0.52-0.92;OR =0.68,1.35,95％CI:0.38-1.21,0.93-1.95;MD =0.69,95％CI:-0.67-2.05;RR =0.00,95％ CI:-0.02-0.01,P ＞0.05).Conclusion PBD in the pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignant obstructive jaundice cannot reduce postoperative mortality and incidence of complications in patients,and should not be used as the conventional management in the perioperative period.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate therapeutic effect and reliability of bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) for high risk level benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A total of 230 cases of high risk of BPH were treated with TUPKP. Among them, 132 cases with the residual urine of 40 to 420 ml had accepted long term but inefficient medical therapy, 98 cases were suffered with repeating acute urinary retention. One hundred and seventy-three cases with the functional capacity>4 MET were performed the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), the other 57 cases with the functional capacity<4 MET were accepted the minimally invasive TURP. Among them 12 cases complicated with bladder stones accepted Ho: YAG lithotripsy priory. The international prostate symptom score (IPSS), The maximal urinary flow rate (Qmax) and residual urine of the 2 groups before and after operation were analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There was no transurethral resection syndrome occurred in both groups. After 3 to 12 months of follow-up postoperatively, the IPSS of the two groups were reduced from (21.9+/-5.7) and (23.7+/-5.0) to (4.4+/-2.3) and (5.5+/-2.4), residual urine were reduced from (61.8+/-18.4) ml and (103.9+/-77.3) ml to (13.0+/-6.2) ml and (15.8+/-6.1) ml, respectively. The Qmax was increased from (5.7+/-3.0) ml/s and (4.8+/-2.8) ml/s to (20.9+/-6.3) ml/s and (16.8+/-3.9) ml/s, there existed significant differences (P<0.01). However the IPSS, Qmax and residual urine of the standard group had progressed more obviously than the minimally invasive TURP group (P<0.05).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>It is safe and effective to use TUPKP for treating high risk patients of BPH with classic TURP and minimally invasive TURP according to different functional capacity. When the functional capacity is more than 4 MET, the standard procedures is preferred.</p>