ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the application effect of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise(Mini-CEX) in clinical teaching rounds of nursing students, and to provide reference for improving the quality of clinical teaching.@*Methods@#A total of 120 nursing students from June 2017 to June 2018 were divided into control group and intervention group by the time of practice with 60 cases each. The control group adopted traditional nursing teaching rounds, while the intervention group adopted Mini-CEX-based nursing teaching rounds. The comprehensive results of nursing students′practice, Mini-CEX and autonomous learning ability of the two groups were compared and analyzed.@*Results@#The overall evaluation of Mini-CEX of nursing students was (7.23 ± 0.51) in the intervention group and (5.27 ± 1.12) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=12.337, P <0.01). The excellent rate of nursing students was 58.3%(35/60) in the intervention group and 30.0%(18/60) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=10.914, P <0.01). The total score of autonomous learning ability was (114.85 ± 6.27) in the intervention group and (90.78 ± 8.22) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=18.034, P < 0.01). The comprehensive results of nursing students′ practice was (87.04 ± 6.46) in the intervention group and (74.35 ± 6.04) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=11.115, P< 0.01).@*Conclusions@#Clinical teaching rounds based on mini-clinical exercise assessment scale can improve the clinical comprehensive service ability, self-learning ability and humanistic care ability of intern nurses.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of the clinical teaching model based on the miniclinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX) scale in Department of General Surgery,and to provide a reference for improving the quality of clinical teaching in Department of General Surgery.Methods A total of 82 nursing interns in Department of General Surgery from June 2016 to June 2018 were enrolled,among whom 41 undergraduates in 2016 were enrolled as control group and 41 undergraduates in 2017 were enrolled as intervention group.The undergraduates in the control group were taught with the traditional clinical teaching method,and those in the intervention group were taught with the clinical teaching model based on the Mini-CEX scale.The two groups were compared in terms of department examination results,score of the Mini-CEX scale,and quality assessment score of clinical nursing teaching,in order to evaluate the teaching quality in Department of General Surgery.Results Compared with the control group,the intervention group had significantly higher department examination score [(96.56 ± 4.23) vs.(90.42 ± 5.12)] and total score of Mini-CEX scale [(5.22 ± 0.45) vs.(4.01 ± 1.03)].The intervention group had a significantly higher excellent rate than the control group (P＜0.05).The intervention group also had a significantly higher quality assessment score of clinical nursing teaching than the control group [(98.34 ± 6.12) vs.(92.45 ± 5.16)].Conclusion The clinical teaching model based on the Mini-CEX scale can improve the quality of teaching and clinical teaching skills in department of general surgery and thus improve the clinical skills and comprehensive quality of nursing interns.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the application effect of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise(Mini-CEX) in clinical teaching rounds of nursing students, and to provide reference for improving the quality of clinical teaching. Methods A total of 120 nursing students from June 2017 to June 2018 were divided into control group and intervention group by the time of practice with 60 cases each. The control group adopted traditional nursing teaching rounds, while the intervention group adopted Mini-CEX-based nursing teaching rounds. The comprehensive results of nursing students′ practice, Mini- CEX and autonomous learning ability of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The overall evaluation of Mini-CEX of nursing students was (7.23 ± 0.51) in the intervention group and (5.27 ± 1.12) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=12.337, P<0.01). The excellent rate of nursing students was 58.3% (35/60) in the intervention group and 30.0% (18/60) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=10.914, P <0.01). The total score of autonomous learning ability was (114.85 ± 6.27) in the intervention group and (90.78 ± 8.22) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t =18.034, P < 0.01). The comprehensive results of nursing students′practice was (87.04 ± 6.46) in the intervention group and (74.35 ± 6.04) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (t=11.115, P<0.01). Conclusions Clinical teaching rounds based on mini-clinical exercise assessment scale can improve the clinical comprehensive service ability, self-learning ability and humanistic care ability of intern nurses.