Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery ; : 115-121, 2018.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-915663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES@#To identify risk factors for infection after spinal surgery.SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Infection after spinal surgery is relatively uncommon. However, such infections cause serious consequences and increased costs and sequelae. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery include a posterior approach, instrumentation, the use of an allogenic bone graft, transfusion, and a long operating time. Patient-related factors include diabetes and obesity.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#From January 2009 to December 2013, 350 patients who underwent surgery at our hospital due to spinal disease, including 10 patients with a postoperative spinal infection, were evaluated. We investigated patients' age, gender, morbidity due to diabetes mellitus, body mass index, level of surgery, approach, location, instrumentation, and operation type.@*RESULTS@#Ten of the 350 patients developed a spinal infection after surgery. The proportion of diabetic patients among the infected patients was higher than among the non-infected patients, although the difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, the proportion of diabetic patients with hemoglobin A1c levels greater than 7.0% was higher among the infected patients. Operating time, the surgical approach, drain tube insertion, transfusion, and the use of an allogenic bone graft were not significantly different between the infected and non-infected patient groups.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Uncontrolled diabetes is the most important risk factor for the development of spinal infection after surgery. Therefore, in order to prevent infection after surgery, blood glucose should be controlled before surgery.

2.
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery ; : 157-166, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-715567

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cortical suspensory femoral fixation is commonly performed for graft fixation to the femur in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendons. The purpose of this study was to compare graft healing in the femoral tunnel, implant-related failure, and clinical results between fixed- and adjustable-length loop devices in outside-in ACL reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 109 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using the outside-in technique from December 2010 to July 2014 were included. For femoral graft fixation, a fixed-length loop device was used in 48 patients (fixed-loop group) and an adjustable-length loop device was used in 61 patients (adjustable-loop group). For evaluation of graft healing in the femoral tunnel, magnetic resonance imaging was performed at postoperative 6 months and the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the tendon graft and tendon-bone interface in the femoral bone tunnel were evaluated. The presence of synovial fluid was evaluated to determine loop lengthening at the femoral tunnel exit. Clinical results assessed using International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner-Lysholm Knee Scoring scale, and knee instability tests were compared between groups. RESULTS: The SNRs of the tendon graft and tendon-bone interface were not statistically different between groups. The presence of synovial fluid at the femoral exit showed no statistical difference between groups. Clinical results were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The adjustable-length loop device provided comparable graft healing, implant-related failure, and clinical results with the fixed-length loop device, allowing adaptation of the graft to the different tunnel lengths. Therefore, it could be effectively used with an adjustment according to the femoral tunnel length.


Subject(s)
Humans , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , Anterior Cruciate Ligament , Femur , Knee , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Synovial Fluid , Tendons , Transplants
3.
Journal of Korean Society of Spine Surgery ; : 115-121, 2018.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-765611

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for infection after spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Infection after spinal surgery is relatively uncommon. However, such infections cause serious consequences and increased costs and sequelae. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery include a posterior approach, instrumentation, the use of an allogenic bone graft, transfusion, and a long operating time. Patient-related factors include diabetes and obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2013, 350 patients who underwent surgery at our hospital due to spinal disease, including 10 patients with a postoperative spinal infection, were evaluated. We investigated patients' age, gender, morbidity due to diabetes mellitus, body mass index, level of surgery, approach, location, instrumentation, and operation type. RESULTS: Ten of the 350 patients developed a spinal infection after surgery. The proportion of diabetic patients among the infected patients was higher than among the non-infected patients, although the difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, the proportion of diabetic patients with hemoglobin A1c levels greater than 7.0% was higher among the infected patients. Operating time, the surgical approach, drain tube insertion, transfusion, and the use of an allogenic bone graft were not significantly different between the infected and non-infected patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Uncontrolled diabetes is the most important risk factor for the development of spinal infection after surgery. Therefore, in order to prevent infection after surgery, blood glucose should be controlled before surgery.


Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Glucose , Body Mass Index , Diabetes Mellitus , Obesity , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Diseases , Transplants , Wound Infection , Wounds and Injuries
4.
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow ; : 151-157, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-739730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nonunion of lateral humeral condyle fracture causes cubitus valgus deformity. Although corrective osteotomy or osteosynthesis can be considered, there are controversies regarding its treatment. To evaluate elbow joint biomechanics in non-united lateral humeral condyle fractures, we analyzed the motion of elbow joint and pseudo-joint via in vivo three-dimensional (3D) kinematics, using 3D images obtained by computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: Eight non-united lateral humeral condyle fractures with cubitus valgus and 8 normal elbows were evaluated in this study. CT scan was performed at 3 different elbow positions (full flexion, 90° flexion and full extension). With bone surface model, 3D elbow motion was reconstructed. We calculated the axis of rotation in both the normal and non-united joints, as well as the rotational movement of the ulno-humeral joint and pseudo-joint of non-united lateral condyle in 3D space from full extension to full flexion. RESULTS: Ulno-humeral joint moved to the varus on the coronal plane during flexion, 25.45° in the non-united cubitus valgus group and −2.03° in normal group, with statistically significant difference. Moreover, it moved to rotate externally on the axial plane −26.75° in the non-united cubitus valgus group and −3.09° in the normal group, with statistical significance. Movement of the pseudo-joint of fragment of lateral condyle showed irregular pattern. CONCLUSIONS: The non-united cubitus valgus group moved to the varus with external rotation during elbow flexion. The pseudo-joint showed a diverse and irregular motion. In vivo 3D motion analysis for the non-united cubitus valgus could be helpful to evaluate its kinematics.


Subject(s)
Biomechanical Phenomena , Congenital Abnormalities , Elbow , Elbow Joint , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Joints , Osteotomy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL