ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We compared the clinical and radiological RESULTS of two patient-groups who had had PCL reconstruction for grade III PCL injury using the autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft at the isometric point and at the anatomical point of femoral condyle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 31 patients who were involved in this study, 20 patients had consecutive isometric PCL reconstructions between June 1993 and May 1995(group 1), And 11 patients had anatomi- cal PCL reconstructions between 1995 and 1997(group 2). We evaluated the clinical results using the Lysholm knee scoring system and measured the posterior translation of the tibial condyle on the posterior stress lateral radiographs. RESULT: The average posterior translation at the final follow-up was 7mm in group 1 and 5.9mm in group 2. The Lysholm knee score was 89 points in group 1, and 92 point in group 2. However, there wasn't any statistically significant difference in clinieal and radiological results between the two groups. SUMMARY: The clinical and radiological results can be influenced by several factors inherent to arthro-scopically assisted PCL reconstruction. Although it seems that initial knee kinematics can be improved by more distal PCL graft placement, there may be little effect to the final clinical and radiological results according to the femoral tunnel positions.
Subject(s)
Humans , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts , Follow-Up Studies , Knee , Tendons , TransplantsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasty using cemetless acetabular cup and several kinds of morseled bone grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed 20 cases of revision total hip arthroplasties between July 1993 and June 1996. Acetabular bone deficiency was classified as type I in 4 hips, type II in 13 hips, type III in 2 hips and type IV in one hip by AAOS classification. Autogenous bone graft was used in 10 cases, heterograft in 5 cases, allograft in 2 cases and a mixture with autografts and allografts in 2 cases. The average contact rate between cup and host bone was 33.5% in type I acetabular deficiency, 65.1% in type II, 50% in type III and 39% in type IV. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score was 82.9 points at the last follow-up. Osseous union between host bone and graft bone occurred within 6 months in 14 cases. Radiological failure was noted in 8 cases at the last follow-up. Three cases were revised during the follow-up period. Five cases out of 7 cases in which the contact rate between acetabular cup and host bone was less than 50% were determined to be a radiologic failure. Only 2 cases of the 10 cases in which autogenous bone graft had failed grafts. The rate of complication was 7cases (35%). CONCLUSIONS: The usage of the hemispherical cementless acetabular cup with autogenous bone graft and increasing the contact rate between the acetabular cup and host bone could be a safe management method in revision total hip arthroplasty. We recomrnend avoiding the use of heterograft in cementless cup revision arthroplasty.