Augmentation mammaplasty Using saline filled implant: Clinical experience in 368 cases

The perfect breasts are supposed to be symmetrically balanced and proportionate to the rest of the body with softness, good-position, and mobility to respond to gravity and postural change. But saline filled implants have some disadvantages compared to silicone gel implant. Their low viscosity creates an unnatural feeling and suboptimal aesthetic result, their deflation offers the most important complication such as rippling or size reduction of breast. Therefore precise preoperative design, exact procedure and appropriate postoperative care are essential to optimal result. In past 5 years, we have performed the transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty using saline filled implants on 183 female patients whose breasts were hypoplastic and followed up 58 months maximally. All patients were assisted with endoscopy. We employed round, textured type implant with the size ranging from 120cc to 270 cc and overinflated them 10 to 20% beyond its original volume. The overall result was satisfactory but some cases of capsular contracture, deflation, implant displacement and infection were found. On the basis of our experience, we suggest some critical points so as to obtain the best result: what conforms to the patients anatomy and satisfies her goal at the same time. First of all, preoperative design in accordance with the dimension is very important. The best dimension for each patient depends on the definition of the ideal base width of the breast. Secondly, exact subpectoral dissection using endoscopy, no-touch technique for the implant is essential to achieve excellent results. Finally, postoperative self management must not be ignored.

Correction of deviated nose using reverse swinging door precedure

There have been so many methods described for the correction of the deviated noses but it is difficult to get satisfactory results and recurrence rate is high. There is no exact explanation why the recurrences are so high and no estabished guides for techniques according to the surgical pathology. We found the classical swinging door technique effective in cases where the caudal septum deviated from the midline. However, where the caudal septum and the tip stay in the midline, scoring or submucosal resection do not work well enough to cortet them. We used the reverse swinging door technique of our own. After elevation of mucoperichonodrium, we did sagittal section in the posterior septum and moved the septum to the midline on the pivot point of the caudal septum and. The gap created in the posterior portion of the septum were filed with bone grafts, cartilage grafts or Medopor, which were sutured to the septum, We did this technique with or without osteotmies in 56 deviated noses for last 5 years. The results were very satisfactory and there was no complication.