The effect of xylometazoline spray for expansion of nasal cavity / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: During nasotracheal intubation it is important to have proper pretreatment for nasal mucosa constriction and nasal cavity expanding. Nasal packing of epinephrine gauze is widely used as well as xylometazoline. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic intranasal spray of xylometazoline against epinephrine gauze packing in expanding the nasal cavity. METHODS: Volunteers (n = 32) in their twenties without nasal disease such as septal deviation or rhinitis were enrolled in the study. The more patent nostril in each subject was measured by acoustic rhinometry as the base value. After intranasal spray of xylometazoline, the same nostril was remeasured by same method. Twenty four hours later, intranasal packing of epinephrine gauze was done and the same treatment was done. Subject preferences about the procedures were asked. RESULTS: There were significant difference among treatments (base value: 0.582 +/- 0.164 cm2, xylometazoline spray: 0.793 +/- 0.165 cm2, epinephrine gauze packing: 0.990 +/- 0.290 cm2) in acoustic rhinometry. While the epinephrine gauze packing showed more efficient mucosa constriction, subjects preferred xylometazoline spray. CONCLUSIONS: Even though xylometazoline spray was less effective than epinephrine gauze packing, the simplicity and convenience compensated. In patients undergoing nasotracheal intubation, xylometazoline spray can be an alternative to epinephrine gauze packing.

A portable inhalational induction device provides co-operative induction of anaesthesia in preanaesthetic area for children / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: We introduce a new, simple portable inhalational induction device (PD) that provides co-operative inhalational induction of anaesthesia using N2O and subsequent sevoflurane in the preanaesthetic induction area in children. METHODS: Forty-five children (30 to 94 months old age, <35 kg) who were scheduled to undergo simple operations were assigned randomly to one of three regimens. Patients were encouraged by their parents to inhale N2O followed by sevoflurane (PD N2O-sevo group) or sevoflurane (PD sevo group) using a portable inhalational induction device in the preanaesthetic induction area until they were unable to respond to their names. They were then transferred to the operating room while maintaining inhalation of sevoflurane via the device. The control group underwent conventional inhalational induction in the operating room with the parents in attendance. RESULTS: Patients in the PD N2O-sevo group had a higher co-operative inhalation frequency than the patients in the PD sevo or the control group. Anaesthesia induction in the PD N2O-sevo and the PD sevo groups were faster than in the control group. Parent satisfaction score (0-100) was higher for the PD N2O-sevo group than for the control group. CONCLUSIONS: A new portable inhalational induction device allows faster induction in co-operation with parents present in the preanaesthetic induction area compared to conventional inhalational induction in the unfamiliar operating room with the parents in attendance.

The effect of sono-guided brachial plexus block on postoperative pain control for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: comparison with general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Interscalene brachial plexus block (IS-BPB) offers many advantages over general anesthesia for both arthroscopic and open surgeries of the shoulder, including shorter hospital stay, reduced postoperative analgesia requirements, and avoidance of the risks and side effects of general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of postoperative pain control by IS-BPB to general anesthesia for performing arthroscopic shoulder surgery. METHODS: Sixty patients were divided into three groups: general anesthesia (group A, n=20), general anesthesia and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) (group B, n=20), and only IS-BPB(group C, n=20). All patients received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and were instructed to rate their pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10. VAS was measured at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Hospital stays were recorded. RESULTS: VAS decreased significantly with time in group A and B (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1), but not in group C. Group C had less pain at 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, hours postoperatively than the other groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). Group C had shorter hospital stays than the other groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). CONCLUSIONS: IS-BPB results in less postoperative pain and a shorter hospital stay than general anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery (P < 0.05).