ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Even though vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) using head-mounted display (HMD) has been highlighted recently as a popular virtual reality platform, we should consider that HMD itself do not provide interactive environment for VRT. This study aimed to test the feasibility of interactive components using eye tracking assisted strategy through neurophysiologic evidence. METHODS: HMD implemented with an infrared-based eye tracker was used to generate a virtual environment for VRT. Eighteen healthy subjects participated in our experiment, wherein they performed a saccadic eye exercise (SEE) under two conditions of feedback-on (F-on, visualization of eye position) and feedback-off (F-off, non-visualization of eye position). Eye position was continuously monitored in real time on those two conditions, but this information was not provided to the participants. Electroencephalogram recordings were used to estimate neural dynamics and attention during SEE, in which only valid trials (correct responses) were included in electroencephalogram analysis. RESULTS: SEE accuracy was higher in the F-on than F-off condition (P=0.039). The power spectral density of beta band was higher in the F-on condition on the frontal (P=0.047), central (P=0.042), and occipital areas (P=0.045). Beta–event-related desynchronization was significantly more pronounced in the F-on (–0.19 on frontal and –0.22 on central clusters) than in the F-off condition (0.23 on frontal and 0.05 on central) on preparatory phase (P=0.005 for frontal and P=0.024 for central). In addition, more abundant functional connectivity was revealed under the F-on condition. CONCLUSION: Considering substantial gain may come from goal directed attention and activation of brain-network while performing VRT, our preclinical study from SEE suggests that eye tracking algorithms may work efficiently in vestibular rehabilitation using HMD.
Subject(s)
Electroencephalography , Healthy Volunteers , Rehabilitation , Vestibular DiseasesABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of CAGE (cut down, annoyed, guilty feeling, eye-opener) for older adults in community METHODS: Randomly selected alcohol drinking 182 older adults over 65 years of age in Incheon-Chungu participated in this study. We assessed alcohol use disorder by Korean Composite International Diagnostic Interview (K-CIDI) and interviewed by CAGE. The CAGE questionnaire is a brief alcohol screening questionnaire that can be interviewer or self-administered. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for CAGE scores of 1-4 for older adults over 65 years of age was calculated. RESULTS: The mean age of 182 people was 71.3 (+/-5.2) years old and the number of male and female was 142 (78.0%) and 40 (22.0%) respectively. In 239 alcohol drinking older adults, 182 (76.2%) people answered in CAGE and CIDI. Among 182 people, 58 was Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and 124 was non-AUD. There was no age and educational differences between 182 people (case group) and 57 people (exclusion group). The sensitivity and specificity for a cut-off score of two was 72.5% and 85.5% respectively. The calculation of area under curve (AUC) by Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) was 0.806. CONCLUSION: The CAGE can easily discriminate older adults with alcohol use disorder from those without such a history. We suggest a score of '2' as the optimal cut-off score of CAGE.