The Diagnosis and Prognosis of Impingement Syndrome in the Shoulder with Using Quantitative SPECT Assessment: A Prospective Study of 73 Patients and 24 Volunteers

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing impingement syndrome without rotator cuff tear usually depends on the physical examination and roentgenography, and obtaining objective evidence for this condition is at best difficult. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether quantitatively assessing this condition with using single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) can diagnose impingement syndrome and predict the postoperative results. METHODS: Before executing arthroscopic or open treatment, SPECT was performed on 73 patients and 24 volunteers and these people were followed up for 2 years. Any increased uptake on SPECT was investigated by using the axial view, which demonstrated the greatest uptake for the acromion, distal clavicle, greater tuberosity, lesser tuberosity and the coracoid process of the operated and non-operated sides. RESULTS: The patients who were diagnosed as having impingement syndrome with or without rotator cuff tear showed increased uptake on the operative side compared to the non-operated side in the assessed locations. The greater tuberosity of the humerus could be used for quantitative measurement as a postoperative prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The bone SPECT method is useful for making the diagnosis of patients with impingement sydrome, and the results of quantitative assessment at the greater tuberosity can be used for evaluating the prognosis following the operation.

Glenoid lesion in Traumatic Anterior Instability of Shoulder

No abstract available.

Triceps-Sparing Posterior Approach for Intra-articular Fracture of Distal Humerus

PURPOSE: To evaluate the therapeutic results of intra-articular fracture of distal humerus treated through triceps sparing posterior approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2001 to December 2003, we reviewed total 9 cases of intra-articular fracture of distal humerus, which were treated by surgical treatment and were followed more than for 12 months. According to the OTA classification, nine cases were classified as type A; two, as type C1; five, as type C2; two. Triceps sparing posterior approach was used in all nine patients. An extensile posterior incision was used over the olecranon without triceps muscle injury. Exposure of the fracture site was done by obtaining medial-lateral mobility through dissection of medial and lateral edge of triceps muscle. Therapeutic results were assessed by bone union, duration for fracture union, complication. and for functional estimation, Mayo elbow performance score was checked and analysed. RESULTS: The range of the elbow joint motion was flexion contracture 5.2 degree to further flexion 135.5 degree on average. Clinical results using Mayo elbow performance score were as follows; six excellent, three good. Compressive neuropathy of ulnar nerve which has been done anterior transposition was observed in one patient. CONCLUSION: Triceps sparing posterior approach is useful surgical technique that provides sufficient exposure of medial and lateral condyle without injury of triceps muscle in intra-articular fracture of distal humerus to the extent of OTA type C2.

Radiologic Result of Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture Using Compression Hip Screw: Involvement of Lateral Cortex

PURPOSE: To assess the meaning of the unstable intertrochanteric fracture of femur with involvement of lateral cortex by analysing the radiologic result of the surgical treatment using a compression hip screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Classifing patients (who has taken the surgical treatment for intertrochanteric fracture of femur using compression hip screw from January 1999 to June 2002) in our hospital with 24 patients who had not much difference statistically in the compression screw located within the femur, Tip-Apex distance (TAD) the Singh Numerical Value of osteoporosis. The results were divided into two groups, group A (without fracture extends through lateral cortex of femur: 16 cases) and B (fracture extends through lateral cortex of femur: 8 cases), when analyzing it. And then analyzed the final examination in the evaluation of electrical potential level by radiology, change of the inside and outside of neck-shaft angle, descent level of the screw and the change of the neck-shaft angle. RESULTS: In the latest follow up, the sliding amount of the screw in group B, the average was 14.9+/-9.3 mm, and 6.7+/-3.6 mm in group A. There was no difference statistically (p value>0.05). In the varus change in group B, the average was 8.00+/-8.12degrees and in group A it ws 2.75+/-2.63degrees There was statistical difference(p value<0.05). In displacement after operation, it was 7.60+/-2.61 mm in group B and 0.5+/-1.80 mm in group A. There was statistical difference (p value<0.05). CONCLUSION: The intertrochanteric fracture with involvement of lateral cortex of femur have to be considered as unstable fracture having tendency of displacement.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Nonunion after Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of non-union after a posterolateral spinal fusion. LITERATURE REVIEW SUMMARY: In the case of nonunion after a posterolateral spinal fusion, the anterior column should be reconstructed. However, due to epidural scarring and fibrosis, the approach to the anterior column by conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is difficult. The authors have modified the original transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) developed by Dr. Harms, which offers potential advantages and provides a surgical alternative to the traditional methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and August 2003, 10 cases of TLIF for the treatment of non-unions after a posterolateral spinal fusion were performed. There were 8 male and 2 female cases. The mean age of the patient was 63.3 years, ranging from 53 to 75 years. The levels of the TLIF were the L4-5 and L5-S1 in 9 and 1 cases, respectively. The mean interval between the revision and previous operations was 21.3 months, ranging 12 to 48 months. In the preoperative radiography, bony defect in posterolateral fusion mass, halos around screws and abnormal motions in the stress view were observed. Using the previous midline approach, exposure of the bilateral articular and transverse processes were performed. With a small osteotome, the superior articular process was removed along a line parallel to the superior margins of the pedicular screw head, to allow access to the neural foramen and lateral aspect of the disc space. The TLIF was performed through this space by inserting cages. The loosened screw was replaced by one that was thicker, coupled with a cancellous bone graft in the foramen. RESULTS: The average operation time and blood loss were 224 min. and 727 cc, respectively. Using Kirkaldy-Willis categories, the results were excellent in 1 case, good in 7, fair in 1 and poor in a further 1 case, with 1 case of nonunion was observed postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of nonunion after a posterolateral spinal fusion is a reliable and safe technique, which seems to have the merit of less morbidity.

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Nonunion after Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion / 대한척추외과학회지

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of non-union after a posterolateral spinal fusion. LITERATURE REVIEW SUMMARY: In the case of nonunion after a posterolateral spinal fusion, the anterior column should be reconstructed. However, due to epidural scarring and fibrosis, the approach to the anterior column by conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is difficult. The authors have modified the original transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) developed by Dr. Harms, which offers potential advantages and provides a surgical alternative to the traditional methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2002 and August 2003, 10 cases of TLIF for the treatment of non-unions after a posterolateral spinal fusion were performed. There were 8 male and 2 female cases. The mean age of the patient was 63.3 years, ranging from 53 to 75 years. The levels of the TLIF were the L4-5 and L5-S1 in 9 and 1 cases, respectively. The mean interval between the revision and previous operations was 21.3 months, ranging 12 to 48 months. In the preoperative radiography, bony defect in posterolateral fusion mass, halos around screws and abnormal motions in the stress view were observed. Using the previous midline approach, exposure of the bilateral articular and transverse processes were performed. With a small osteotome, the superior articular process was removed along a line parallel to the superior margins of the pedicular screw head, to allow access to the neural foramen and lateral aspect of the disc space. The TLIF was performed through this space by inserting cages. The loosened screw was replaced by one that was thicker, coupled with a cancellous bone graft in the foramen. RESULTS: The average operation time and blood loss were 224 min. and 727 cc, respectively. Using Kirkaldy-Willis categories, the results were excellent in 1 case, good in 7, fair in 1 and poor in a further 1 case, with 1 case of nonunion was observed postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of nonunion after a posterolateral spinal fusion is a reliable and safe technique, which seems to have the merit of less morbidity.