ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of patients with giant benign prostatic hyperplasia and their effects on erectile function. Methods:A total of 100 patients with GBPH who received treatment in the General Hospital of Taiyuan Iron and Steel (Group) Co., Ltd., from February 2017 to January 2020 were included in this study. They were randomly assigned to undergo either PKRP (PKRP group, n = 50) or TURP (TURP group, n = 50). Perioperative indicators were recorded. Urodynamic indicators and serum indicators pre- and post-operation were compared between the two groups. Erectile function and quality of life were compared between the two groups. The incidences of postoperative complications such as erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence and urethral stricture were calculated. Results:Operative time, hospital stay, catheter indwelling time, and intraoperative blood loss in the PKRP group were significantly shorter and less than those in the TURP group ( t = 14.35, 8.74, 6.20, 8.34, all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in residual urine volume and maximum urine flow rate measured before surgery between the two groups ( t = 0.59, 0.73, both P > 0.05). After surgery, residual urine volume decreased and maximum urine flow rate increased in each group. Residual urine volume was significantly lower and maximum urine flow rate was significantly higher in the PKRP group compared with the TURP group ( t = 19.85, 11.67, both P < 0.001). Before surgery, there were no significant differences in serum prostate-specific antigen and free prostate-specific antigen between the two groups ( t = 0.43, 0.33, both P > 0.05). After surgery, both serum prostate-specific antigen and free prostate-specific antigen decreased in each group, and both serum prostate-specific antigen and free prostate-specific antigen were significantly lower in the PKRP group than those in the TURP group ( t = 16.01, 5.09, both P < 0.001). Before surgery, there were no significant differences in quality of life (QOL) score and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score between the two groups ( t = 0.62, 0.63, both P > 0.05). After surgery, IIEF score was increased and QOL score was decreased in each group. After surgery, IIEF score in the PKRP group was significantly higher than that in the TURP group [(25.06 ± 3.61) points vs. (21.52 ± 3.05) points, t = 5.29, P < 0.001], and QOL score in the PKRP group was significantly lower than that in the TURP group [(1.05 ± 0.18) points vs. (1.58 ± 0.29) points, t = 5.29, 10.98, both P < 0.001]. The incidence of complications in the PKRP group was significantly lower than that in the TURP group ( χ2 = 5.98, P < 0.05). Conclusion:This study investigated the effects of TURP versus PKRP on giant benign prostatic hyperplasia from the aspects including erectile function, QOL, and perioperative indicators. This study is of certain innovation. Findings from this study confirm that both PKRP and TURP can improve erectile function, serum indicators, and urodynamic indicators in patients with giant benign prostatic hyperplasia. PKRP is preferred because it is less invasive, results in better improvements in erectile function, serum indicators, and urodynamic indicators, and has fewer complications than TURP.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Shuo Tong ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteric stones.Methods The data of 832 patients,who underwent Shuo Tong ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser for the treatment of upper ureteric stones were collected between July 2014 and February 2017.The patients accepted general anesthesia under lithotomy position.After dilating the ureter,a ureteral access sheath was inserted along the guide wire.Finally,stones were broken and clean up by Shuo Tong ureteroscope.According to the stone size,823 patients were divided into ≤2.0 cm group (n=112,13.6％),2.1-3.0 cm group (n =395,48.0％),3.1-4.0 cm group (n =257,31.2％),＞ 4.0 cm group (n =59,7.2％)The stone free rate(SFR) and post-operative complications were observed.Results Among 983 operations,663 cases accepted one-stage operations and 160 cases accepted second stage operations.the operative time and postoperative hospital stay were 23-145 min(mean 74.8 ± 35.3) and 1-5 days(mean 1.9 ±0.8),respectively.The SFR in the first day and one month after operation was 75.6％ and 83.8％,respectively.The stone free rate in each group were 89.3％,82.5％,61.1％,52.5％ at first day after operation respectively(P ＜ 0.05).While,the SFR after one month were 95.5％,87.6％,72.0％,61.0％ in each group,respectively(P ＜ 0.05).Fever rate after operation was 11.1％,ureteral injury rate was 1.9％,severe hematuria rate was 0.6％,stone street formation rate was 1.2％,perirenal hematoma rate was 0.4％.All patients were improved after conventional treatment.Conclusion Shuo Tong ureteroscopy is a safe treatment with high stone free rate for upper ureteric stones.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Shuo Tong ureteroscopy in the treatment of upper ureteric stones.Methods The data of 832 patients,who underwent Shuo Tong ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser for the treatment of upper ureteric stones were collected between July 2014 and February 2017.The patients accepted general anesthesia under lithotomy position.After dilating the ureter,a ureteral access sheath was inserted along the guide wire.Finally,stones were broken and clean up by Shuo Tong ureteroscope.According to the stone size,823 patients were divided into ≤2.0 cm group (n=112,13.6％),2.1-3.0 cm group (n =395,48.0％),3.1-4.0 cm group (n =257,31.2％),＞ 4.0 cm group (n =59,7.2％)The stone free rate(SFR) and post-operative complications were observed.Results Among 983 operations,663 cases accepted one-stage operations and 160 cases accepted second stage operations.the operative time and postoperative hospital stay were 23-145 min(mean 74.8 ± 35.3) and 1-5 days(mean 1.9 ±0.8),respectively.The SFR in the first day and one month after operation was 75.6％ and 83.8％,respectively.The stone free rate in each group were 89.3％,82.5％,61.1％,52.5％ at first day after operation respectively(P ＜ 0.05).While,the SFR after one month were 95.5％,87.6％,72.0％,61.0％ in each group,respectively(P ＜ 0.05).Fever rate after operation was 11.1％,ureteral injury rate was 1.9％,severe hematuria rate was 0.6％,stone street formation rate was 1.2％,perirenal hematoma rate was 0.4％.All patients were improved after conventional treatment.Conclusion Shuo Tong ureteroscopy is a safe treatment with high stone free rate for upper ureteric stones.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TUEVP vs TURP for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).MethodsLiferatures on randomized controlled trials(RCT),non-randomized controlled trials(NRCT) and retrospective controlled trials of both Chinese and English studies about TUEVP vs TURP for the treatment of BPH all over the world were searched by Pubmed,Ovid,ScineceDirect,NGC,EBSCO,EMBASE,CNKI,CBM,as well as manual search of four Chinese journals: Chinese of Journal of Androloy,National Journal of Androlgy,Chinese Journal of Urology,Journal of Clinical Urology.Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility,evaluated the quality and extracted the data from the eligible studies,with confirmation by cross-checking.Divergences of opinion were settled by discussion or consulted by the expert.Meta-analysis was processed by Rev Man 5.0,fail-safe number(Nfs) was performed by SAS8.0.ResultsSeventeen RCTs involving 2413 men were enrolled the inclusion criteria in Meta analysis.The baseline of patients' characteristics was comparable in all the studies.By evaluating the relevant indicators,side effects and complications between TUEVP and TURP,the statistically significant differences of pooled estimates suggested a benefit of TUEVP over TURP for bladder wash-out time,catheterization time,hospital stay,incidence of ED(20.6% vs 29.0%).In contrast,pooled estimates of the difference favoured TURP over TUEVP for MFR and incidence of postoperative secondary hemorrhage(7.9% vs 3.6%).ConclusionThis formal meta-analysis suggests that both TUEVP and TURP in patients with BPH provide comparable improvements,whose efficacy and safety is similar.While comparative analysis is limited by the methodological shortcomings of the underlying studies and the short follow-up,both TURP and TUEVP may offer distinct advantages.More high quality trials with large sample and longer follow-up are proposed,which will provide more evidence about evidence based medicine.
ABSTRACT
Ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) was done on 103 hypertensive patients according to clinical stages and left ventricular measure (LVM) was randomly done on a portion of the patients. The results showed that the variability of stage-Ⅱ-group's 24 hour systolic pressure and stage-Ⅲ-group's systolic and diastolic pressures was significantly higher than that of stage-Ⅰ-group (P