ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the serological markers and surgical indicators associated with biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation, explore their influencing factors and predictive indicators. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 101 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2016 to June 2022, according to the presence or absence of biliary complication (BC) at 6 months after surgery, they were divided into BC group with 21 patients and non-BC group with 80 patients.The t -test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between groups, and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive performance of combined indicators. Results Among the 101 patients, 21(20.8%) experienced BC.The multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that MELD score (odds ratio[ OR ]=0.134, 95% confidence interval[ CI ]: 0.031-0.590, P =0.008), SⅡ/Alb ( OR =1.415, 95% CI : 1.181-1.696, P =0.001), and plasma transfusion volume ( OR =1.001, 95% CI : 1.000-1.002, P =0.032) were independent risk factors for the development of BC in patients after liver transplantation.MELD score, SⅡ/Alb, plasma transfusion volume, MELD+SⅡ/Alb, and MELD+SⅡ/Alb+plasma transfusion volume had an area under the ROC curve of 0.712, 0.870, 0.712, 0.900, and 0.918, respectively, in predicting BC after liver transplantation. Conclusion SⅡ/Alb, plasma transfusion volume and MELD score are independent risk fators for BC after liver transplantation.The combination of three indicators has good predictive value and clinical guiding significance for BC after liver transplantation.
ABSTRACT
At present, hepatectomy has become the preferred treatment modality for most benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases. Liver failure is a common complication after hepatectomy, and for malignant diseases, how to remove the lesion to the maximum extent and reduce the incidence rate of liver failure after hepatectomy is the key problem at present. Accurate and adequate preoperative evaluation of liver reserve function can provide a basis for judging the progression, therapeutic outcome, and prognosis of liver diseases. There are currently various methods for evaluating liver reserve function and surgical feasibility, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, and there is still a lack of a single comprehensive evaluation method. This article reviews the characteristics of commonly used evaluation methods and related research advances.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the risk factors of infection after hepatectomy for liver cancer, and to establish and validate a risk prediction model. Methods The clinical data of 167 patients with primary liver cancer who underwent hepatectomy in People's Hospital of Wuhan University from January 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively collected. All patients were divided into postoperative infection group ( n =28) and non-infection group ( n =139) according to whether postoperative infection complications occurred. The t -test or Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups and the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to screen the risk factors of infection after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma, and a nomogram risk prediction model for postoperative infection was established. All patients were randomly divided into training cohort ( n =119) and the validation cohort ( n =48) according to the ratio of 7∶ 3, the Bootstrap method was used for internal validation of the model, and the model calibration curve and ROC curve were used to evaluate the calibration and discrimination of the nomogram model. Results Postoperative infection occurred in 28 of 167 patients (16.8%). Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes, CONUT score ≥4 points, preoperative NLR, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and drainage tube placement time > 7 d were independent risk factors for infection after hepatectomy for liver cancer (all P 7 d has good predictive performance and has high predictive value for high-risk patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:Proximal femoral nail antirotation and femoral head replacement could quickly recover hip function in intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly, but whose efficacy is better remains controversial. OBJECTIVE:To compare the differences in the effects of proximal femoral nail antirotation and femoral head replacement on intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly by using a meta-analysis. METHODS:The relevant literatures were searched in PubMed, Cochrane, CNKI, Wanfang database and VIP, and other relevant journal such asChinese Journal of Orthopaedicsand Orthopedic Journal of Chinafor articles published in recent five years. Randomized controled trials concerning proximal femoral nail antirotation and femoral head replacement for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the Chinese elderly were colected. Baseline data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative out-of-bed time, length of stay, Harris score, complication rate and number of death were colected and processed using RevMan 5.30 software for meta analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Totaly 37 clinical controled trials with 3 216 patients were recruited. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with femoral head replacement, proximal femoral nail antirotation was at a disadvantage in postoperative out-of-bed time, length of stay and joint function in the early stage. No significant difference in complication and mortality was detected between proximal femoral nail antirotation and femoral head replacement. However, proximal femoral nail antirotation had some advantages such as short operation time, smal trauma, and less intraoperative blood loss, and showed good midterm and long-term outcomes of joint function.