ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the effects of parameters, such as planning target volume (PTV), calculation grid size, and dose threshold, on the dosimetric verification result of three dosimetric verification systems ArcCHECK, SRS MapCHECK, and 3DMap for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).Methods:Based on the dosimetric verification result of the SBRT plans of 50 patients, this study compared the effects of PTV (<25 cm 3 and ≥25 cm 3), calculation grid size (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm), and dose threshold (5%, 10%, and 15%) on the γ passing rates of the three dosimetric verification systems at five criteria, i. e., 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 3 mm/1%, 2 mm/3%, and 2 mm/2%. Results:The changes in PTV affected 3DMap more significantly. With an increase in PTV, the γ passing rates of 3DMap at the criteria of 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 2 mm/3%, and 2 mm/2% increased by 2.2%, 2.2%, 4.4%, and 4.7% ( t=-2.76, -2.17, -4.72, -3.86, P<0.05), respectively. The increase in the calculation grid from 1.0 mm to 1.5 mm had greater effect on MapCHECK, with the γ passing rates at the criteria of 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 3 mm/1%, 2 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% decreased by 0.7%, 1.1%, 1.7%, 0.9%, 1.5% ( t=-6.15, -6.23, -5.98, -5.11, -8.34, P<0.05), respectively. The increases in the calculation grid from 1.0 mm to 2.0 mm had greater impact on ArcCHECK, with the γ passing rates at the criteria of 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 3 mm/1%, 2 mm/3%, 2 mm/2% decreased by 1.0%, 1.7%, 2.4%, 1.7%, 2.7% ( t=-4.75, -7.3, -8.63, -7.11, -8.26, P<0.05), respectively. The increase in the dose threshold from 5% to 10% had greater impact on ArcCHECK, with the γ passing rates at the criteria of 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 2 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% decreased by 1.1%, 1.4%, 2.5%, and 3.0% ( t=5.20, 5.68, 8.17, 9.99, P<0.05), respectively. Moreover, the increase in the dose threshold from 5% to 15% had more impact on 3DMap, with the γ passing rates at the criteria of 3 mm/3%, 3 mm/2%, 2 mm/3%, and 2 mm/2% decreased by 1.6%, 1.7%, 2.8%, and 3.2% ( t=3.25, 2.98, 4.40, 4.21, P<0.05), respectively. Conclusions:Target volume, calculation grid, and dose threshold are influencing factors in the dosimetric verification of three dosimetric verification systems for SBRT. Therefore, the effects of these parameters should be considered for different verification systems in clinical applications.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To compare the dosimetric differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans optimized with 3 different fluence smoothing parameters using Monaco treatment planning system.@*Methods@#A total of 15 patients with middle and upper esophageal carcinoma were planned with Low fluence smoothing (Low), Medium fluence smoothing (Medium) and High fluence smoothing(High) during VMAT optimization. The dosimetric differences in D95, Dmean, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI) of targets, dose volume histogram (DVH) of organs at risk (OARs), and monitor unit (MU) were compared.@*Results@#There were no significant differences in D95, Dmean, CI and HI of targets, as well as in V40 and Dmean of the heart, V10, V20 and Dmean of the lung , and segment number among plans optimized with different fluence smoothing techniques (P>0.05). Plans with high fluence smoothing achieved less V30 of heart, Dmax of cord PRV(t=-2.167, -0.999, P<0.05), lower MU (t=-3.148, -6.692, P<0.05), but increased V5 of both lungs (t=1.306, -2.027, P<0.05) compared with plans with Medium and Low fluence smoothing. Plans with low fluence smoothing irradiated higher dose to the V30 and Dmean to heart (t=0.411, 0.589, 0.013, P<0.05), but less V5 of the lungs (t=0.423, P<0.05) compared with plans with medium fluence smoothing.@*Conclusions@#All VMAT plans with 3 different fluence smoothing can meet the clinical requirements. VMAT plans optimized with high fluence smoothing are recommended in the treatment of patients middle and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the dosimetric differences of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans optimized with 3 different fluence smoothing parameters using Monaco treatment planning system.Methods A total of 15 patients with middle and upper esophageal carcinoma were planned with Low fluence smoothing (Low),Medium fluence smoothing (Medium) and High fluence smoothing (High) during VMAT optimization.The dosimetric differences in D95,D conformity index (CI),homogeneity index (HI) of targets,dose volume histogram (DVH) of organs at risk (OARs),and monitor unit (MU) were compared.Results There were no significant differences in D95,D CI and HI of targets,as well as in V40 and D of the heart,V10,V20 and D of the lung,and segment number among plans optimized with different fluence smoothing techniques (P＞0.05).Plans with high fluence smoothing achieved less V30 of heart,Dmax of cord PRV (t=-2.167,-0.999,P＜0.05),lower MU (t=-3.148,-6.692,P＜O.05),but increased V5 of both lungs (t=1.306,-2.027,P＜O.05)compared with plans with Medium and Low fluence smoothing.Plans with low fluence smoothing irradiated higher dose to the V30 and D to heart (t=O.411,0.589,0.013,P＜0.05),but less V5 of the lungs (t=O.423,P＜0.05) compared with plans with medium fluence smoothing.Conclusions All VMAT plans with 3 different fluence smoothing can meet the clinical requirements.VMAT plans optimized with high fluence smoothing are recommended in the treatment of patients middle and upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the potential dosimetric advantages of half jaw volumetric modulated arc therapy ( H-VMAT) applied to the Oropharyngeal Cancer, comparing with full jaw VMAT (F-VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy ( IMRT ). Methods Planning CT images of 10 oropharyngeal cancer patients were retrospectively chosen and transferred to Eclipse treatment planning system v. 11. 0 (Varian Medical Systems, Pala Alto, USA), based on which H-VMAT, W-VMAT, and IMRT plans were created. Two full arcs (360°) were adopted for VMAT planning, and the 7 beams were equally distributed for IMRT planning. The optimization constraints remained the same for the three kinds of plans. The dosimetric parameters such as D2 , D98 , D50 , HI, and CI were evaluated for PGTV, PCTV1, PCTV2, PGTVln, and PCTVln. In addition, the maximum dose (Dmax) and D1 cc(minimum dose received by 1cc) of the brainstem and spinal cord were analyzed respectively. The mean dose ( Dmean ) to the parotids, oral cave, larynx, and cervical normal tissues were also reviewed. The monitor units ( MU) for all treatment plans were recorded. Results Comparisons of the three planning techniques showed that H-VAMT improved the HI and CI of the targets (except PCTV2) significantly (HI: F =3. 959, 6. 764, 10. 581, 6. 770, 13. 040, P<0. 05;CI:F=6. 594, 4. 138, 0. 842, 4. 031, 5. 388, P<0. 05);reduced Dmax(F=4. 509, 20. 331, P<0. 05) and D1 cc for brainstem and spinal cord (F=27. 432, 26. 314, P<0. 05) significantly;reduced Dmean(F=4. 279, 29. 498, 19. 295, P<0. 05) to the normal tissues of the mouth, throat and neck significantly. The V50 of the mouth and throat were slightly lower in IMRT plans (F=8. 140, P<0. 05). IMRT was slightly better than W-VMAT in sparing oral cavity and larynx, but the dose distribution was the worst. The H-VMAT plans showed the best dose distribution in the cervical normal tissues, especially for the lower and posterior parts, where IMRT plans displayed high dose curves. Conclusions H-VMAT is dosimetrically superior than W-VMAT and IMRT for oropharyngeal cancer, which could be considered for clinical applications.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of stainless steel applicator on dose distribution in GZP 60 Co brachytherapy source and to obtain the dosimetric parameters of the 60 Co source with stainless steel applicator. Methods Geant4 was employed to obtain the mean adsorption dose of the 60 Co brachytherapy source in the range of 0-10 cm, and the dosimetric parameters were calculated according to the formula proposed by AAPM reports TG43 and TG43U1. The 60 Co source was located in the center of a sphere water phantom with a radius of 30 cm. Results For channel 1 and 2 of GZP 60 Co source, the results of Λ with stainless steel applicator were 1. 014 cGyh-1 U-1( with a difference of 0. 5％ compared with non-applicator) , the results of Λ with stainless steel applicator for channel 3 were 0. 998 cGyh-1 U-1 ( with a difference of 0. 1％ compared with non-applicator) . The radial dose function in the range of 0. 5-10. 0 cm in a longitudinal direction was calculated and the fitting formula for the function was obtained. The polynomial function for the radial dose function and the anisotropy function with a of 0°-175° and an r of 0. 5-10. 0 cm were obtained. Conclusion The dosimetric parameters of the 60 Co source with stainless steel applicator are obtained, which provide more accurate reference data for clinical application. In clinical practice, the effect of stainless steel applicator on dose distribution should be considered.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare dosimetric parameters between automated and manualvolumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT) plans in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients,and to investigatethe feasibility and dosimetric advantage of the automated VMAT planning.Methods Automated and manual VMAT plans were generated with Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (TPS) for twenty-three postoperative cervical cancer patients,including eight patients in stage Ⅱ A and fifteen in stage Ⅱ B,respectively.The differences in D D95,conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) of target,as well as dose volume histogram (DVH) of organs at risk (OAR),planning time,average optimization time and monitor unit (MU) were compared between automated and manual VMAT plans.Results The average D CI and HI of automated VMAT plans were better than those of manual VMAT plans (t=4.65-14.92,P ＜0.05).There was no significant difference in D95 (P ＞0.05).The automated VMAT plans achieved better average dosimetric parameters on OARs compared with the manual VMAT plans (t =3.30-14.42,P ＜ 0.05).Automated VMAT plans had a significantly shorter planning time (72 min,t =3.85,P ＜ 0.05) and interruption frequency (twice,t =5.41,P ＜ 0.05) than manual VMAT plans.However,automated VMAT plans had a higher average MU than manual VMAT plans with an average MU of 819 ± 53 and 638 ± 41 for automated and manual VMAT plans,respectively.Conclusions It is feasible to generate automated VMAT plans with Pinnacle3 TPS for postoperative cervical cancer patients.The automated VMAT plans increase the plan quality and reduce the optimization time compare with manual VMAT plans.Automated technique also eliminates the influence of human factors on the plan quality.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the dosimetric influence of dwell weight standard deviation (DWSD) and applicator displacement in cervical cancer patients treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy.Methods A total of 20 cervical cancer patients who had completed radical treatment were selected in this study.The Fletcher applicator (Nucletron#189.730) was used for these patients.A new plan,based on the former CT images and structures,was designed for each patient.In former and new plans,dwell weight was recorded,and DWSD was calculated.Two groups,low-DWSD (LDWSD,0.141-0.299) and high-DWSD (HDWSD,0.211-0.337),were set according to the DWSD size for the two plans.Dosimetric effects from ± 1 mm displacement of tandem applicator or ovoid applicator were simulated with Oncentra (R) Brachy V4.3 treatment planning system.D100,D90,and V150 for clinical target volume (CTV)and D0.1cc,D1cc,and D2cc for the bladder,rectum,and sigmoid were evaluated.Dosimetric comparisons were made between the LDWSD group and HDWSD group to study the dosimetric effects of DWSD and applicator displacement in cervical cancer patients.Results The dosimetric effects from applicator displacement increased with increasing DWSD.If there was a 1 mm displacement of tandem applicator or ovoid applicator,D100,D90,and V150 of CTV were 3.0％,23.8％,and 4.8％ higher or 0.5％,1.2％,and 5.2％ higher in the HDWSD group than in the LDWSD group;D0.1cc,D1cc,and D2cc of the bladder and rectum were significantly higher in the HDWSD group than in the LDWSD group,particularly for the sigmoid (up 44.0％,22.8％,and 16.8％) and (up 10.3％,14.4％,and 12.4％).Conclusions DWSD should be considered in plan evaluation for cervical cancer patients treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy.The dosimetric influence from applicator displacement can be decreased by reducing DWSD properly.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the differences and characteristics of the dose distribution of the two optimization methods in the three dimensional brachytherapy,and provide the basis for clinieal treatment.Methods Excel 2007 was used to generate random number.And a total of 21 patients of cervical cancer were selected from those who have completed the treatment.Inverse simulated annealing optimization (IPSA) plans were designed for graphical optimization (GO) plans.The dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters of the targets (V100％,V150％) and the organs (D1 cm3,D2cm3) of the two methods were analyzed.Results The targets dose of both plans could meet the prescription requirements.There was no statistically significant difference in the dose parameters of all targets (P ＞ 0.05).The closes of D1 cm3 and D2cm3 in the bladder of IPSA plan were significantly lower than that of the GO plan (t =3.596,3.490,P ＜ 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the dose parameters of rectum (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions For cervix brachytherapy,the GO and IPSA have no effect on targets dose,but IPSA optimization can reduce the maximum dose of bladder.