Demographic profile, host, disease & viral predictive factors of response in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection at a tertiary care hospital in north India.

Background & objectives: Standard of care for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in India is peginterferon and ribavirin (RBV). The response to treatment in real life stetting is unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the demographic profile and assess the virological response and predictors of response in CHC patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with CHC were included in this study. Detailed clinical history, risk factors, and predictive factors of response were noted. Patients were treated with peginterferon α2b (1.5 μg/kg/wk) and RBV (12 mg/kg/day) for 6 to 18 months based on response. Results: A total of 211 patients were included in the analysis, mean age 40.6±12.3 yr, 144 (68%) were males and 71 (34%) had compensated cirrhosis. Commonest risk factor for acquiring CHC was previous transfusion and surgery (51%). Genotype 3 (72%) was most common followed by genotype 1 (23%). Overall sustained virologic response (SVR) was 64 per cent [95% CI 57.1%-70.4%]. The SVR was 66.5 per cent [95% CI 58.34-73.89%] for genotype 3 and 61.2 per cent [95% CI 46.23 to 74.80%] for genotype 1. Non-cirrhotics had better SVR rates compared to cirrhotics (76 vs 41%, P<0.001). On multivariate analysis, BMI ≥23 kg/m2, HOMA-IR ≥2, compliance (≤80%), and fibrosis >2 were predictors of low SVR. Interpretation & conclusions: Genotype 3 was the commonest HCV genotype. The commonest source of infection was previous transfusion and surgery. SVR rates for genotypes 3 were better than genotype 1 patients. Predictors of non-response were high BMI, insulin resistance, significant fibrosis and inadequate compliance.

A prospective study of risk factor profile & incidence of deep venous thrombosis among medically-ill hospitalized patients at a tertiary care hospital in northern India.

Background & objectives: Hospitalization for medical-illness is associated with an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, there are no published data from India addressing at this issue. We sought to study the risk factor profile and the incidence of DVT among hospitalized medically-ill patients, a tertiary care hospital in northern India. Methods: All adults admitted to the medical wards and intensive care unit with level 1 or 2 mobility over a period of two years (July 2006 to July 2008) at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences hospital, New Delhi, were prospectively studied. Patients having DVT at admission or an anticipated hospital stay less than 48 h were excluded. The presence of clinical risk factors for DVT was recorded and laboratory evaluation was done for hypercoagulable state. A routine surveillance venous compression Doppler ultrasonography was performed 12 ± 8 days after hospital admission. Results: Of the 163 patients, 77 (47%) had more than one risk factor for DVT. Five (3%) patients developed DVT; none of them had symptomatic DVT. None of these patients received anticoagulation prior to the development of DVT. The mean age of those who developed DVT was 40 ± 13 (25-50) yr; two of five were male. The incidence rate of DVT was 2.7 per 1000 person-days of hospital stay [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87 to 6.27]. None of the factors was found to be significantly associated with the risk of DVT. Interpretation & conclusions: In our setting, although many hospitalized medically-ill patients had risk factors for DVT, the absolute risk of DVT was low compared to the western population but clearly elevated compared to non hospitalized patients. Large studies from India are required to confirm our findings.