Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2023 Sep; 71(9): 3235-3241
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-225248

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To assess the current trends in use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, especially intracameral antibiotics (ICAB), for cataract surgery in India. Methods: This was an E?survey using a previously validated questionnaire carried out by the All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) in August 2022. An E?mail invitation to complete an online 40?point survey was sent to all members of the AIOS using a digital E?mail service (Survey Monkey) and social media platforms. Results: Out of 1804 total respondents, 58% (n = 1022) reported using routine ICAB prophylaxis. Of those using ICAB, 89% (n = 909) reported using it for all cases, whereas the rest used it for specific indications such as post?PC rent (n = 43), one eyed patient (n = 19), and high?risk cases (n = 50). Commercially available moxifloxacin was by far the commonest agent used for ICAB (n = 686, 67%). Eighty respondents (8%) reported noticing occasional toxic reactions and nontoxic corneal edema (n = 64, 6%) with ICAB. Surgeons with >10 years� experience especially practicing in medical colleges used fewer ICAB (OR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.38 � 0.72, P < 0,001) compared to younger surgeons (<5?year experience) in solo clinics. The commonest reason for nonadoption of IC antibiotics was 搖nconvinced of the need to use it in my setting� (n = 296, 52% of those who answered this question). Conclusion: IC antibiotic prophylaxis for cataract surgery has significantly increased in India from 40% in 2017 to 58% in 2022. Commercially available moxifloxacin was preferred by the majority users. Intraocular inflammation may occur occasionally and needs safer formulations to avoid this

2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2023 Mar; 71(3): 784-789
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224932

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To investigate the prognostic factors for visual outcome in patients undergoing immediate pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for posteriorly dislocated lens fragments during phacoemulsification surgery. Methods: This was a single?center, retrospective, cross?sectional study of 37 eyes of 37 patients undergoing immediate PPV for posteriorly dislocated lens fragments from 2015 to 2021. The primary outcome measure was changes in the best?corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Additionally, we analyzed the predictive factors for poor visual outcomes (BCVA <20/40) and perioperative complications. Results: The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age of the patients was 66.57 (±10.86) years, with an almost identical gender profile (M: F = 18/19 [48.64%:51.36%]). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA improved significantly from the baseline (1 [0.6–1.48], ~20/200) to the final visit (0.3 [0.2–0.6], ~20/40) (P < 0.0001) after a mean (±SD) follow?up of 6.35 (±6.32) months. The final BCVA was 20/40 or better in 59.5% of the eyes. Poor final BCVA (<20/40) was associated with small preoperative pupillary size (P = 0.02), presence of preoperative ocular pathology (P = 0.02) including uveitis, glaucoma, and clinically significant macular edema (CSME), intraoperative displacement of >50% of lens matter into the vitreous (P < 0.001), use of iris?claw lens (P < 0.001), and postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME; P = 0.007). The postoperative complications included CME (13.51%), retinal detachment (10.81%), chronic uveitis (8.11%), glaucoma (8.11%), iritis (2.7%), posterior chamber IOL (PCIOL) dislocation (2.7%), and vitreous hemorrhage (2.7%). Conclusion: For retained lens fragments in complicated phacoemulsification surgery, immediate PPV is a viable approach with the potential for a good visual outcome. The important predictors for poor visual outcomes include a small preoperative pupil size, preexisting ocular pathology, displacement of significant volume of lens matter (>50%), use of an iris?claw lens, and CME.

3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2014 June ; 62 (6): 753
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-155693
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL