Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 2011 Jan-Feb; 77(1): 83-93
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-140780

ABSTRACT

Modern day dermatologists conduct different esthetic and surgical procedures, with risk of infective complications. Hence, infection control practices need to be established in dermatological practice to minimize the risk of exogenous infections. These practices include hand washing, cleaning, sterilization, disinfection, operation theater sterilization and specifications. Proper hand washing after examination of each patient and prior to any surgery with a formulation containing alcohol alone or as a combination with other agents reduces the chances of transferring infections to and from patients. Sterilization and disinfection constitute the most important aspect of infection control. Disinfectants and disinfecting procedures vary according to the environment and equipment. Proper knowledge of different processes/agents for sterilization and disinfection is essential. Disinfectants for use in hospitals should always be freshly prepared and should be of adequate strength. Sterilization is carried out most commonly using steam sterilizers or ethylene dioxide sterilizers. The waste generated during practice is a potential source of nosocomial infections and should be treated as per the proper protocol and guidelines. Trained staff to carry out these practices is essential.

2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-70303

ABSTRACT

Postoperative endophthalmitis is a very devastating complication and every step should be taken to reduce its occurrence. Unattended air conditioning filter systems are often the culprits and regular maintenance of the filters is of paramount importance. Shedders of pathogenic organisms amongst the theater personnel should be identified by regular screening and should be promptly treated. In addition to the use of Povidone iodine 5% solution in the conjunctival sac few minutes prior to surgery, proper construction of wound, injectable intraocular lenses, use of prophylactic intracameral antibiotics or prophylactic subconjunctival antibiotic injection at the conclusion of cataract surgery, placing a patch after the surgery for at least 4 h and initiating topical antibiotics from the same day of surgery helps to lower the frequency of postoperative endophthalmitis. Intraoperative posterior capsule rupture and anterior vitrectomy are risk factors for acute endophthalmitis, and utmost care to prevent posterior capsular rent should be taken while performing cataract surgery. Also, in case of such complication, these patients should be closely monitored for early signs of endophthalmitis in the postoperative period. In the unfortunate event of endophthalmitis the diagnosis should be prompt and treatment must be initiated as early as possible.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Endophthalmitis/etiology , Eye Infections, Bacterial/etiology , Humans , Hygiene , Risk Factors , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology
3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2003 Jun; 51(2): 171-6
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-70163

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Postoperative infections can be caused by a contaminated environment, unsterile equipment, contaminated surfaces, and infected personnel as well as contaminated disinfectants. In order to establish guidelines for microbiological monitoring, a detailed microbiological surveillance was carried out in an ophthalmic hospital. METHOD: Over a period of 21 months, we assessed environmental Bacteria Carrying Particle(BCP) load and surface samples weekly (n = 276); the autoclaving system once a month and repeated whenever the process failed (n = 24); the air conditioning filters for fungal growth once in four months (n = 15), and the disinfectant solution for contamination once in two months (n = 10). Additionally, the personnel involved directly in surgery were screened for potential pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and beta haemolytic streptococci. RESULT: On 14 (5.07%) occasions the environment in the operating rooms had a significant risk of airborne infections. Sterilisation of instruments in the autoclaves was unsatisfactory on 4 (16.66%) occasions. Samples from the filters of the air-conditioning units yielded potentially pathogenic fungi on 3 (20%) occasions. Personnel sampling revealed that 5 (8.77%) individuals harboured beta haemolytic Streptococci in the throat and 4 (7.01%) harboured S. aureus in the nasal cavity. The samples of disinfectant in use were not contaminated. CONCLUSION: There is a need to standardise microbiological evaluation protocols for operating rooms.


Subject(s)
Disinfection , Environmental Microbiology , Equipment Contamination , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Operating Rooms , Surgical Equipment
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL