ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy in the treatment of patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for T3 N0 stage. Methods Totally 555 cases of T3 N0 , who underwent t neoadjuvant radiotherapy or adjuvant radiotherapy from 2004 to 2014, were selected from the SEER cancer registry in this study. 486 cases received neoadjuvant radiotherapy ( neoadjuvant radiotherapy group ) and 69 cases received adjuvant radiotherapy ( adjuvant radiotherapy group). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyze the overall survival ( OS) and cancer specify survival ( CSS) of the two groups. A propensity score model was utilized to balance the baseline covariates. Results The CSS in the neoadjuvant radiotherapy group was significantly better than that in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (χ2 = 6. 030, P<0. 05 ) . Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that age, gender, and radiotherapy sequence with surgery were important factors influencing the prognosis of esophageal cancer with T3N0 stage ( Wald=10. 099, 10. 562, 4. 331, P<0. 05) . Compared with the neoadjuvant radiotherapy group, the adjuvant radiotherapy group had a worse CSS ( hazard ratio:1. 649, 95％CI 1. 173-2. 316, P=0. 004) and OS ( hazard ratio:1. 402, 95％CI 1. 020-1. 928, P=0. 037) . According to K-M survival analysis, the adjuvant radiotherapy group showed the worse CSS ( hazard ratio: 1. 813, 95％CI 1. 072-3. 069, P=0. 027) and OS ( hazard ratio: 1. 424, 95％ CI 0. 896-2. 262, P=0. 134) than the neoadjuvant radiotherapy in esophageal cancer with T3N0 stage, which was similar to the matched cohort. Conclusions Compared with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy significantly improves the CSS and OS of T3 N0 patients with esophageal cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the application of bundles of intervention in the treatment of postoperative delirium in esophageal cancer.Methods Thirty-six cases of delirium associated with esophageal cancer(study group)after the application of bundles of intervention in the Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from November 2015 to August 2016 were analyzed,and 41 cases of postoperative delirium(control group)from January 2015 to October 2015 were treated by routine treatment.Results The mean duration of postoperative delirium was(3.6±0.8)d in the study group and(4.7± 1.2)d in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(t =4.783,P<0.01).The incidence rates of other complications in the study group and control group were 19.4％(7/36)and 34.1％(14/41),respectively,and there was no significant difference(χ2=2.089,P=0.148).The incidence rates of accidental events in the study group and control group were 13.9％(5/36)and 31.7％(13/41),respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(χ2= 4232,P= 0.040).There was no significant difference in the postoperative exhaust time and removal of chest tube drainage time between the two groups(both P＞ 0.05),but there was a significant difference in postoperative hospital stay and hospital costs between the two groups(t values were 4.726 and 2.065,both P<0.05).Conclusions In the treatment of postoperative delirium in esophageal cancer,applying the bundles of intervention concept is feasible and effective.It can significantly reduce postoperative delirium duration and accelerate the rehabilitation of patients.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the application of bundles of intervention in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma anastomotic leak.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2014 to May 2015, 44 cases of esophageal carcinoma anastomotic fistula were treated by bundles of intervention (through the collection of a series of evidence-based treatment and care measures for the treatment of diseases) in Department of Thoracic Surgery, Huai'an First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University (bundles of intervention group), and 68 patients with esophageal carcinoma postoperative anastomotic leak from December 2013 to January 2012 receiving traditional therapy were selected as the control group. The clinical and nutritional indexes of both groups were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>There were no significant differences in general data and proportion of anastomotic leak between the two groups. Eleven patients died during hospital stay, including 3 cases in bundles of intervention group(6.8%) and 8 cases in control group (11.8%) without significant difference(P = 0.390). In bundles of intervention group, 1 case died of type III( intrathoracic anastomotic leak, 2 died of type IIII( intrathoracic anastomotic leak. In control group, 2 cases died of type III( cervical anastomotic leak, 2 died of type III( intrathoracic anastomotic leak and 4 of type IIII( intrathoracic anastomotic leak. The mortality of bundles of intervention group was lower than that of control group. The duration of moderate fever [(4.1±2.4) days vs. (8.3±4.4) days, t=6.171, P=0.001], the time of antibiotic use [(8.2±3.8) days vs.(12.8±5.2) days, t=5.134, P = 0.001], the healing time [(21.5±12.7) days vs.(32.2±15.8) days, t=3.610, P=0.001] were shorter, and the average hospitalization expenses[(63±12) thousand yuan vs. (74±19) thansand yuan, t=3.564, P=0.001] was lower in bundles of intervention group than those in control group. Forty-eight hours after occurrence of anastomotic leak, the levels of hemoglobin, albumin and prealbumin were similar in both groups. However, at the time of fistula healing, the levels of hemoglobin [(110.6±10.5) g/L vs.(103.8±11.1) g/L, t=3.090, P=0.002], albumin [(39.2±5.2) g/L vs.(36.3±5.9) g/L, t=2.543, P=0.013] and prealbumin [(129.3±61.9) g/L vs.(94.1±66.4) g/L, t=2.688, P=0.008] were significantly higher in bundles of intervention group.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>In the treatment of postoperative esophageal carcinoma anastomotic leak, application of bundles of intervention concept can significantly improve the nutritional status and improve the clinical outcomes.</p>