Ear diseases and hearing in the Thai elderly population. Part I. A comparative study of the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment by general practitioners vs ENT specialists.

The prevalence of ear disease and hearing disability in elderly Thais in 14 urban communities around Siriraj Hospital was studied. The accuracy of diagnosis and treatment of common ear diseases and of screening for hearing loss in the elderly between general practitioners (GP) and Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) specialists was also compared. Elderly people aged 60 years or more who had registered with the health care program had their ear and hearing check-up performed by GPs and ENT specialists from mobile team. Altogether, 980 subjects were included, 332 were males, 648 were females, (male:female ratio 1:2). Their ages ranged from 60-96 years with an average age of 68.5 years. The prevalence of ear disease diagnosed by ENT specialists was 16.3 per cent (95% CI = 14.0-18.6), 12.5 per cent was external ear disease and 2.7 per cent middle ear disease. The most common ear problem was impacted ear wax (8%), the second most common problem was otitis externa (4.3%). Compared with an ENT specialist, the ability of a GP to diagnose ear diseases had a sensitivity of 46.5 per cent and a specificity of 80.3 per cent, the positive predictive value of their diagnoses was 31.5 per cent. The efficacy of the treatment of ear diseases in 51 elderly people by GPs and in 63 elderly people by ENT specialists was statistically significantly different (p = 0.02). Hearing screening by the GP using whisper or the watch test performed in 650 elderly people revealed abnormal findings (could not hear) in 70 cases or 10.8 per cent. Hearing screening using pure tone audiometry in 980 elderly people showed abnormal hearing level in 508 cases (52.4%). 9.5 per cent of them had a bilateral moderate to severe degree of hearing impairment. There was no difference in the level of hearing impairment between males and females or between right and left ears. The prevalence of hearing loss increases with increasing age. Tympanometry performed by an acoustic impedance machine in 980 of the elderly showed a conductive hearing loss in 85 cases (9.1%). The authors conclude that the prevalence of ear disease in elderly people living in the urban community around Siriraj Hospital is quite high. Although the ear diseases commonly encountered were not serious, if left untreated they may lead to complication and decreased hearing. Therefore, the proficiency of GPs in the management of common ear diseases in every community should be regularly maintained. Hearing impairment is very prevalent and increases with age. Thus, screening for hearing loss using an audiometer and/or acoustic impedance is recommended for all senior citizens in their community at least once a year. Early detection of elderly persons who could benefit from a properly fitted hearing aid will certainly improve the quality of life and may prevent psychiatric and functional impairment of the Thai elderly population.

Ear diseases and hearing in the Thai elderly population. part II. A one year follow-up study.

The ear and hearing survey of the Thai elderly in 14 urban communities around Siriraj Hospital was repeated one year after the first survey in order to detect any changes. Altogether 556 elderly people came for follow-up examination, 191 were males, 365 were females, the average age was 68.2 years (60-88 years). Ear disease was diagnosed by ENT specialists in 80 cases which implied that the prevalence of ear disease was 14.4 per cent. This was not statistically significantly different from the prevalence of ear disease in the survey conducted in the previous year and although the elderly who had ear diseases in the first survey had already been treated, the prevalence did not decrease. Some elderly people only had ear diseases in this survey. Hearing evaluation by pure tone audiometry was performed in 549 elders. There were 12.4 per cent who had bilateral, moderate to severe hearing loss which was 2.9 per cent higher than in the previous survey. The hearing level had also deteriorated in 14.3 per cent of the elderly people. Tympanometry was performed in 556 cases and showed that 10.5 per cent had a conductive hearing loss. When audiometry and tympanometry of the same elderly people were evaluated together, 49.2 per cent of them had a sensorineural hearing loss, 3 per cent had a conductive hearing loss and 6.5 per cent had a conductive or mixed type hearing loss. When the results of audiometry were compared with the self identification/perception of their hearing reported by the elderly in the questionnaires, they were not reliable. In conclusion, a one-year follow-up study of the prevalence of ear disease and hearing impairment in the elderly showed that the prevalence of ear disease was still high and had not changed significantly. Concerning hearing impairment, not only had the prevalence increased, but also the severity of hearing loss. Therefore, the authors stress the need to implement the "Ear and Hearing Care" program for the elderly both in rural and urban communities at least once a year in order to improve quality of life of the elderly Thai people and to prevent complications of ear disease.

Bilateral chylothorax following right radical neck dissection.

Chylothorax is a relatively common complication in non cardiac thoracic surgery or chest injury. However, the accumulation of cycle in pleural space bilaterally following neck dissection is extremely rare, with less than 10 cases documented in literatures. We report a case of bilateral chylothorax following total laryngectomy and right radical neck dissection who was successfully treated conservatively. The anatomy, diagnosis and management of chylothorax following neck dissection are discussed.

The sensitivity of transnasal biopsy at random for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Randomized biopsy by the transnasal blind technique for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was studied. The biopsy was performed under local anaesthesia on first visit of each patient. The sensitivity of the first biopsy was up to 87.06 per cent among random patients (85 patients) and 87.68 per cent among selected patients (138 patients). The overall sensitivity of randomized biopsy from both groups was 87.44 per cent (223 patients), while the sensitivity of endoscopic-guided biopsy in a group of 37 patients was 94.59 per cent. However statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the two methods (p=0.34). It is concluded that transnasal biopsy at random for the diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma should still be recommended because it is simple, safe, well tolerated by the patient and cost-effective as no expensive instruments are required.