ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Compared with classic achalasia, vigorous achalasia has been defined as achalasia with relatively high esophageal contraction amplitudes, often with minimal esophageal dilation and prominent tertiary contractions on radiographs and the presence of chest pain. The lesser success of pneumatic balloon dilation, also, has been reported for the subset with vigorous achalasia. Nevertheless, some authors have questioned the usefulness of making this distinction. We evaluated the difference of clinical manifestations and response to pneumatic balloon dilation between classic and vigorous achalaisia. METHODS: 28 cases involving patients with achalasia who underwent balloon dilation treatment were available for the review of their clinical findings, radiographic, manometric, esophageal scintigraphic parameters. Patients with vigorous achalasia [n=10] were defined by contraction amplitude >or=37 mmHg on esophageal manometry and patients with classic achalasia [n=18] as contraction amplitude <37 mmHg. RESULTS: Both groups of patients had substantial overlap in clinical findings, radiographic, manometric and esophageal scintigraphic parameters. The success rates of balloon dilation, also, were similar for both groups (classic vs vigorous, 78% vs 70%). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the distiction of achalasia as classic and vigorous by an amplitude criterion is arbitrary and not useful.